Boland v. Boland, 2018 MT 288

430 P.3d 1014 (2018) · Montana Supreme Court · November 27, 2018

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed an order granting Jerry Boland a two-year order of protection against his cousin, Paul Boland, following a physical altercation. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Jerry was in reasonable apprehension of bodily injury, despite conflicting testimony about the incident.

Court
Montana Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
James Jeremiah Shea; Beth Baker; Ingrid Gustafson; Dirk M. Sandefur; Jim Rice
Jurisdiction
Montana
Decision date
November 27, 2018
Procedural posture
Paul Boland appealed the Eighth Judicial District Court's order granting Gerald Boland's petition for an order of protection.
Standard of review
The continuation, amendment, or making permanent of an order of protection is reviewed for abuse of discretion; underlying findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. The Supreme Court does not reweigh conflicting evidence or second-guess the district court's credibility determinations.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Parties
Paul Boland v. Gerald (Jerry) Boland
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

domestic violencewrit of certioraristandard of reviewappellate procedureequitable relief

Practice areas

family lawdomestic violenceappellate procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the District Court abused its discretion by finding that Jerry was in reasonable apprehension of bodily injury and granting him a two-year order of protection.
  2. Whether conflicting testimony about the altercation required reversal of the order of protection.
  3. Whether Jerry's alleged participation in or responsibility for the altercation barred equitable relief under the unclean-hands doctrine.

Holdings

  1. The District Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Jerry was in reasonable apprehension of bodily injury and granting him an order of protection.
  2. The Supreme Court will not reweigh conflicting evidence or second-guess the district court's determinations regarding witness credibility and the weight of testimony.
  3. The unclean-hands argument did not require reversal of the order of protection.

Key quotations

Although the hearing transcript contains conflicting evidence regarding potential motivations for the altercation between Paul and Jerry and whether Jerry first threatened Paul or vice versa, it is not this Court's role to reweigh evidence or to determine the strength of conflicting testimony. (¶ 12)

Factual background

Paul and Jerry Boland, cousins involved in longstanding family disputes, had an altercation during a parade in Great Falls after Paul objected to Jerry wearing a hat that had belonged to Paul's father. Witnesses testified that Paul was the initial aggressor, while Paul claimed he felt threatened and attempted to restrain Jerry. Jerry reported the incident, sought medical treatment for a concussion and neck injury, and petitioned for an order of protection for himself, his family, and his business associates.

Procedural history

Gerald Boland petitioned the Eighth Judicial District Court for an order of protection after an altercation with Paul Boland. The District Court issued a temporary ex parte order, held a hearing, and then granted protection for Gerald for two years while denying protection for Gerald's family and associates. Paul appealed, and the Montana Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…