Summary
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of Sherrodd, Inc.'s petition for judicial review of a Department of Labor and Industry decision awarding Percy Hoehne overtime compensation and a penalty. The court held that the Department had jurisdiction over the wage claim despite Hoehne's occasional work in North Dakota because the parties and employer were based in Montana and federal and state wage laws applied. The court also held that an employee's failure to assert overtime rights did not waive or estop the statutory claim because overtime protections serve public policy.
Holdings
- The Montana Department of Labor and Industry had jurisdiction to adjudicate Hoehne's claim because the employee and employer were Montana residents, the employer's principal place of business was in Montana, the employment relationship was connected to Montana, and the Department had authority to enforce Montana wage law and the Fair Labor Standards Act.
- An employee's failure to assert the right to overtime compensation does not constitute waiver or estoppel because overtime rights are statutory public rights enacted to protect workers and the public, and cannot be privately waived.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Montana Department of Labor and Industry had jurisdiction to adjudicate Hoehne's wage claim when he sometimes performed work in North Dakota.
- Whether Hoehne was estopped from claiming overtime compensation because he failed to report the overtime hours or inform Sherrodd that he expected overtime pay.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- State v. Holman Aviation Co., 176 Mont. 31, 575 P.2d 923 (1978)(followed)
- Earl Clack Co. v. Staunton, 105 Mont. 375, 72 P.2d 1022 (1937)(limited)
- Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. Ravalli County, 56 Mont. 530, 186 P. 332 (1919)(followed)
- Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co., 55 Mont. 522, 179 P. 499 (1919)(followed)
- Kopischke v. First Continental Corp., 610 P.2d 668, 37 St. Rep. 437 (Mont. 1980)(analogy)
- Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc., 391 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1968)(followed)
- State ex rel. Neiss v. District Court, 162 Mont. 324, 511 P.2d 979 (1973)(followed)
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil, 324 U.S. 697, 65 S. Ct. 895, 89 L. Ed. 1296 (1945)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…