Summary
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment upholding interim zoning regulations adopted by the Lewis and Clark County Board of County Commissioners. The Court held that the interim zoning statute required notice and a public hearing but did not incorporate all procedural requirements applicable to permanent zoning regulations. The Court also held that the Board’s publication of only one of two required notices for permanent zoning regulations did not substantially comply with the statute, and the permanent regulations were therefore void.
Holdings
- Section 76-2-206, MCA, incorporates only the notice and hearing requirements applicable to interim zoning regulations, not all procedural prerequisites for permanent zoning regulations. The Board's two published notices and public hearing satisfied those requirements.
- The Board did not substantially comply with § 76-2-205(5), MCA, because it published only one notice of passage of the resolution of intent when the statute expressly required publication once a week for two weeks. The district court correctly declared the permanent zoning regulations void.
Questions Presented
- Whether the notice and public hearing provided by the Board satisfied the procedural requirements applicable to adoption of interim zoning regulations under §§ 76-2-205 and 76-2-206, MCA (2005).
- Whether the Board substantially complied with the notice requirements of § 76-2-205, MCA (2005), when it published only one notice of passage of the resolution of intent to adopt permanent zoning regulations.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Citizen Advoc. for a Livable Missoula, Inc. v. City Council of City of Missoula, 2006 MT 47, 331 Mont. 269, 130 P.3d 1259(followed)
- Patterson v. Verizon Wireless, 2005 MT 261, 329 Mont. 79, 122 P.3d 1193(followed)
- Steer, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 245 Mont. 470, 803 P.2d 601 (1990)(followed)
- LHC, Inc. v. Alvarez, 2007 MT 123, 337 Mont. 294, 160 P.3d 502(followed)
- Bryant Dev. Ass'n v. Dagel, 166 Mont. 252, 531 P.2d 1320 (1975)(distinguished)
- State ex rel. Christian, Spring, Sielbach & Assoc. v. Miller, 169 Mont. 242, 545 P.2d 660 (1976)(distinguished)
- Yurczyk v. Yellowstone Co., 2004 MT 3, 319 Mont. 169, 83 P.3d 266(distinguished)
- Petty v. Flathead City Bd. of City Comm'rs., 231 Mont. 428, 754 P.2d 496 (1988)(followed)
- State v. Smith, 2004 MT 191, 322 Mont. 206, 95 P.3d 137(followed)
- State v. Feight, 2001 MT 205, 306 Mont. 312, 33 P.3d 623(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…