Burns v. State

277 P.3d 1238 (Mont. 2012) · Supreme Court of Montana · May 8, 2012 · No. DA 11-0577

Summary

The Supreme Court of Montana affirmed the denial of Dan Burns's motion to withdraw his guilty plea to sexual abuse of children. The court held that Burns failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel or that his plea was involuntary, concluding that counsel's advice regarding venue, jury considerations, and potential prior-acts evidence fell within the range of reasonable professional conduct.

Court
Supreme Court of Montana
Writing for the Court
Chief Justice Mike McGrath; Mike McGrath; Brian Morris; Michael E. Wheat; Patricia Cotter; James C. Nelson
Jurisdiction
Montana
Decision date
May 8, 2012
Docket number
DA 11-0577
Procedural posture
Appeal from the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, treated by the district court as a petition for post-conviction relief.
Standard of review
The court will not overturn the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea when the defendant understood the plea's direct consequences and the plea was not induced by threats, misrepresentation, or an improper promise. A post-conviction petitioner bears the burden of proving entitlement to relief by a preponderance of the evidence.
Precedential value
Published Montana Supreme Court opinion; precedential
Parties
Dan Burns v. State of Montana
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

post-conviction reliefineffective assistanceplea bargainingcriminal procedureappellate procedure

Practice areas

Criminal procedurePost-conviction reliefIneffective assistance of counselPlea withdrawal

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Burns established good cause under Montana law to withdraw his guilty plea because the plea was involuntary.
  2. Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by allegedly coercing or improperly advising Burns regarding venue, jury composition, character evidence, and prior allegations of sexual misconduct.

Holdings

  1. Burns did not establish that his guilty plea was involuntary or induced by threats, misrepresentation, or an improper promise; therefore, he did not show good cause to withdraw the plea.
  2. Burns failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel and therefore failed to establish good cause to withdraw his guilty plea.

Key quotations

However, we will not overturn a district court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea if the defendant was aware of the direct consequences of the plea, and if the plea was not induced by threats, misrepresentation, or an improper promise such as a bribe. (¶ 6)
That case established that a defendant must prove (1) that counsel's performance was deficient, and (2) that counsel's deficient performance prejudiced the defense. (¶ 9)

Factual background

Burns was charged with felony sexual abuse of children after allegations that he provided a sex toy to a golf-class pupil and coerced the child to use it while Burns masturbated. He pleaded guilty in exchange for the State's promise not to seek more than 30 years of imprisonment, but the district court later imposed a 60-year sentence with 35 years suspended. Burns claimed that counsel improperly influenced his plea by warning about jury bias, prior-act evidence, and the consequences of a venue change.

Procedural history

Burns pleaded guilty to felony sexual abuse of children after the State agreed not to seek imprisonment exceeding 30 years. The district court sentenced him to 60 years, with 35 years suspended. After an earlier appeal concerning restitution was remanded on the State's concession, Burns filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea alleging ineffective assistance and improper venue-related advice. The district court denied relief, and the Montana Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…