Summary
The Montana Supreme Court held that an adopted child given up for adoption was not a descendant of the natural parent under the plain language of the Cecilia Kincaid Gift Trust. The Court reversed the District Court’s determination that Jennifer Fazio was entitled to a distribution and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- Under the plain language of the trust, any adopted child is regarded as the lawful blood descendant of the adopting parent or parents and is not regarded as a descendant of either natural parent. Because Jennifer Fazio was adopted, she is not a descendant of George under the trust and is not entitled to a distribution.
- Interpretation of a trust agreement is a question of law reviewed for correctness, and the words of the trust are construed in their ordinary grammatical sense absent evidence of a clear contrary intent.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trust's definition of descendants includes a natural child of George Kincaid who was adopted out of George's family.
- Whether the trust's reference to an adopted child is ambiguous or instead plainly applies to any adopted child.
- Whether the court may add or rewrite language in the trust instrument to distinguish children adopted into the family from children adopted out of the family.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- In re Marjorie Q. Ward Revocable Trust, 2011 MT 308, ¶¶ 10, 21, 363 Mont. 72, 265 P.3d 1260(followed)
- In re the Charles M. Bair Family Trust, 2008 MT 144, ¶¶ 32, 40, 53, 343 Mont. 138, 183 P.3d 61(followed)
- Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Coops., Inc., 2007 MT 159, ¶¶ 19, 30, 55, 338 Mont. 41, 164 P.3d 851(followed)
- Ophus v. Fritz, 2000 MT 251, ¶ 23, 301 Mont. 447, 11 P.3d 1192(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…