Summary
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the appellants’ petition seeking interlocutory review of Montana Public Service Commission rulings concerning street-lighting tariff rates and related procedural matters. The Court held that the appellants failed to show that review of a final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy under Section 2-4-701, MCA. The memorandum opinion was designated noncitable under the Montana Supreme Court’s Internal Operating Rules.
Holdings
- Interlocutory judicial review under section 2-4-701, MCA, was not appropriate because the appellants failed to demonstrate that review of a final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy.
Questions Presented
- Whether the District Court erred by dismissing the petition seeking review of the Montana Public Service Commission's preliminary, procedural, or intermediate actions.
- Whether the appellants established under section 2-4-701, MCA, that review of a final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy, thereby permitting interlocutory judicial review.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Williamson v. Mont. PSC, 2012 MT 32, 364 Mont. 128, 272 P.3d 71(followed)
- Wilson v. Dep't of Pub. Serv. Regulation, 260 Mont. 167, 172, 858 P.2d 368, 371 (1993)(followed)
- Kingsbury Ditch Co. v. Dep't of Natural Res. & Conservation, 223 Mont. 379, 382, 725 P.2d 1209, 1210 (1986)(followed)
- Doty v. Mont. Comm'r of Political Practices, 2007 MT 341, ¶ 9, 340 Mont. 276, 173 P.3d 700(followed)
- State v. Hall, 2006 MT 37, ¶ 10, 331 Mont. 171, 130 P.3d 601(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…