Summary
The Montana Supreme Court reversed and remanded a district court order granting Poplar Elementary School District a new hearing on Froid Elementary School District's petition to transfer territory. The Court held that Poplar failed to preserve its statutory argument concerning unsworn testimony and that plain-error review was unwarranted. A dissent would have affirmed on the ground that the county superintendent lacked authority to appoint a deputy to hear and decide the petition.
Holdings
- The Montana Administrative Procedure Act does not govern proceedings before a county superintendent because county superintendents are local government officials and actions of a unit of local government are excluded from MAPA's definition of an agency.
- Poplar failed to preserve its statutory claim because it did not object to the hearing procedure or the receipt of unsworn statements before, during, or after the administrative hearing.
- Poplar's unpreserved statutory claim did not warrant plain-error review because the record showed no manifest miscarriage of justice, fundamental unfairness, or threat to the integrity of the judicial process.
- The district court erred by deciding whether the statute required sworn testimony without first determining whether Poplar preserved the issue and, if not, whether plain-error review was warranted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court erred by holding that the county superintendent abused his discretion by receiving unsworn statements at the territory-transfer hearing.
- Whether the territory-transfer proceeding was governed by the Montana Administrative Procedure Act or the common law for purposes of issue preservation.
- Whether Poplar's unpreserved statutory claim concerning sworn testimony warranted plain-error review.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (18)
- Credit Service Co., Inc. v. Crasco, 2011 MT 211, ¶ 11, 361 Mont. 487, 264 P.3d 1061(followed)
- In re Petition to Transfer From Dutton, 2011 MT 152, ¶ 7, 361 Mont. 103, 259 P.3d 751(followed)
- In re Marriage of Guffin, 2010 MT 100, ¶ 20, 356 Mont. 218, 232 P.3d 888(followed)
- Silva v. City of Columbia Falls, 258 Mont. 329, 335, 852 P.2d 671, 675 (1993)(followed)
- Hunt v. K-Mart Corp., 1999 MT 125, ¶ 10, 294 Mont. 444, 981 P.2d 275(followed)
- Hulse v. DOJ, Motor Vehicle Division, 1998 MT 108, ¶ 46, 289 Mont. 1, 961 P.2d 75(followed)
- McDermott v. Carie, 2005 MT 293, ¶ 24, 329 Mont. 295, 124 P.3d 168(followed)
- State v. Lacey, 2009 MT 62, ¶ 22, 349 Mont. 371, 204 P.3d 1192(followed)
- In re T.E., 2002 MT 195, ¶ 20, 311 Mont. 148, 54 P.3d 38(followed)
- In re D.H., 2001 MT 200, ¶ 41, 306 Mont. 278, 33 P.3d 616(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.