State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Rogers

272 Neb. 450 (2006) · Nebraska Supreme Court · October 20, 2006

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court considered a motion for reciprocal discipline after the District of Columbia Court of Appeals disbarred Reginald J. Rogers for intentionally and criminally misappropriating more than $260,000 from a client. The court granted the motion and disbarred Rogers from practicing law in Nebraska, effective immediately, while also ordering compliance with applicable discipline rules and payment of costs.

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Connolly; Gerrard; Heavican; Lerman; McCormack; Miller; Stephan; Wright
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
October 20, 2006
Procedural posture
The Nebraska Supreme Court considered the Counsel for Discipline's motion for reciprocal discipline after the District of Columbia Court of Appeals disbarred Reginald J. Rogers. Rogers did not respond to the Nebraska Supreme Court's show cause order.
Standard of review
In reciprocal discipline proceedings, the foreign jurisdiction's judicial determination of attorney misconduct is generally conclusive and is not subject to relitigation; the Nebraska Supreme Court independently determines the appropriate discipline based on the particular facts and circumstances.
Precedential value
Published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; precedential
Disposition
other

Topics

remediesappellate procedure

Practice areas

legal ethics and professional responsibilityattorney discipline

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals' determination of attorney misconduct established misconduct for purposes of reciprocal discipline in Nebraska.
  2. What discipline should be imposed on Rogers in Nebraska based on the foreign disbarment and the circumstances of the misconduct.

Holdings

  1. A judicial determination of attorney misconduct in another jurisdiction is generally conclusive proof of guilt and is not subject to relitigation in a reciprocal discipline proceeding; therefore, misconduct occurred and discipline was appropriate.
  2. Rogers should be disbarred from the practice of law in Nebraska effective immediately.

Key quotations

In a reciprocal discipline proceeding, “a judicial determination of attorney misconduct in one jurisdiction is generally conclusive proof of guilt and is not subject to relitigation in the second jurisdiction.” (451)
Respondent shall forthwith comply with Neb. Ct. R. of Discipline 16 (rev. 2004), and upon failure to do so, he shall be subject to punishment for contempt of this court. (452)

Factual background

Reginald J. Rogers was admitted to practice law in Nebraska in 1984. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals disbarred him after finding that he intentionally, dishonestly, and criminally misappropriated more than $260,000 from a client after the client's husband died. Rogers did not respond to the Nebraska Supreme Court's show cause order concerning reciprocal discipline.

Procedural history

Rogers, a Nebraska-admitted attorney, was disbarred by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals for intentionally and criminally misappropriating more than $260,000 from a client. The Counsel for Discipline then filed a motion for reciprocal discipline in Nebraska. After issuing a show cause order and receiving no response from Rogers, the Nebraska Supreme Court granted the motion and imposed disbarment effective immediately.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Nebraska Nebraska Supreme Court