In re Guardianship of Brydon P.

286 Neb. 661 (2013) · Nebraska Supreme Court · October 11, 2013 · No. No. S-12-1065

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court held that, in a minor guardianship proceeding, a county court may assess a successful petitioner’s reasonable attorney fees against the minor’s estate when the guardianship was sought in good faith and serves the minor’s best interests. The court held that the county court may not assess those fees against another party and remanded for further proceedings regarding fees assessed against the estate. The court also affirmed that permanent in loco parentis status could not be conferred in the guardianship proceeding.

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
Connolly, J.; Heavican, C.J.; Wright, J.; Stephan, J.; McCormack, J.; Miller-Lerman, J.; Cassel, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
October 11, 2013
Docket number
No. S-12-1065
Procedural posture
Eric L. appealed the county court's award of the petitioner's attorney fees against him. Silvija P. cross-appealed the denial of her request for permanent in loco parentis status. The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the denial of permanent in loco parentis status, reversed the assessment of attorney fees against Eric, and remanded for further proceedings concerning whether fees could be assessed against Brydon's estate.
Standard of review
Questions of law are reviewed independently. The authorization of attorney fees presents a question of law; the amount of an authorized fee is reviewed for abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
Published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion
Parties
Eric L. v. Silvija P.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

guardianship procedureguardianshipsguardian ad litemstatutory interpretationremedies

Practice areas

guardianshipsprobatefamily lawstatutory interpretationattorney fees

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a county court may assess a successful petitioner's attorney fees against another party in a minor's guardianship proceeding.
  2. Whether Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2613(1)(b) authorizes assessment of a successful petitioner's reasonable costs and attorney fees against the minor's estate.
  3. Whether a county court may confer permanent in loco parentis status on a nonparent in a guardianship proceeding.
  4. Whether the in loco parentis doctrine permits a court to determine in advance that a nonparent will have standing to maintain custody if the biological parent later seeks custody.

Holdings

  1. Under Nebraska's guardianship statutes for minors, a county court is not authorized to assess a petitioner's attorney fees against another party.
  2. When a petitioner seeks appointment as guardian of a minor in good faith and the guardianship is in the minor's best interests, the court may assess the successful petitioner's reasonable costs, including attorney fees, against the minor's estate if one exists.
  3. The county court correctly denied Silvija's request for permanent in loco parentis status.
  4. Whether a nonparent seeking guardianship will have standing to maintain custody if the biological parent later seeks custody cannot be decided in advance of an actual dispute.

Key quotations

We hold that when a court determines that a petitioner seeks a guardianship appointment for a minor in good faith and that the guardianship is in the minor’s best interests, the court is statutorily authorized to assess a successful petitioner’s reasonable costs, including attorney fees, against the minor’s estate, if an estate exists. (669)
Under Nebraska’s guardianship statutes for minors, a county court is not authorized to assess attorney fees against another party. (670)
But because the in loco parentis doctrine is transitory, whether a person seeking guardianship of a minor should have standing to maintain custody if the minor’s biological parent ever seeks custody in the future is an issue that cannot be decided in advance of any dispute. (674)

Factual background

Brydon P.'s mother died after she and her husband were severely injured in a vehicle accident. Brydon's maternal grandmother, Silvija P., sought and obtained an emergency guardianship and was later appointed his permanent guardian. Brydon's adjudicated father, Eric L., intervened but ultimately did not contest the guardianship; the parties disputed whether Silvija could receive permanent in loco parentis status and whether her attorney fees could be assessed against Eric and Brydon's estate.

Procedural history

After Brydon's mother died, the Sarpy County Court appointed his maternal grandmother, Silvija P., as his permanent guardian. The court denied Silvija's request for permanent in loco parentis status but awarded attorney fees and assessed them equally against Brydon's estate and his adjudicated father, Eric L. Eric appealed the fee assessment, and Silvija cross-appealed the denial of permanent in loco parentis status.

Remand instructions

The county court must determine whether to assess all or any part of the fees incorrectly assessed against Eric against Brydon's estate. It must consider the usual factors for determining reasonable attorney fees and whether any further assessment against Brydon's estate would be detrimental to his long-term interests under § 30-2613(1)(b). The denial of permanent in loco parentis status was affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…