Shurigar v. Nebraska State Patrol

293 Neb. 606 (2016) · Nebraska Supreme Court · May 20, 2016 · No. S-15-396

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Heath A. Shurigar’s application for a concealed handgun permit. The court held that Shurigar’s Oklahoma conviction for transporting a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle was based on a law similar to Nebraska Revised Statute § 37-522 and therefore disqualified him under § 69-2433(8).

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
Kelch, J.; Heavican, C.J.; Wright, J.; Connolly, J.; Miller-Lerman, J.; Cassel, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
May 20, 2016
Docket number
S-15-396
Procedural posture
Appeal under the Nebraska Administrative Procedure Act from a district court order affirming the Nebraska State Patrol's denial of Shurigar's application for a concealed handgun permit.
Standard of review
Under the Administrative Procedure Act, the appellate court reviews the district court's judgment for errors appearing on the record, asking whether the decision conforms to law, is supported by competent evidence, and is neither arbitrary, capricious, nor unreasonable. Statutory interpretation is reviewed independently as a question of law.
Precedential value
Published opinion; precedential
Parties
Heath A. Shurigar v. Nebraska State Patrol
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

judicial review of agency actionadministrative procedure actstatutory interpretationplain meaning ruleappellate procedure

Practice areas

administrative lawstatutory interpretationfirearms lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Oklahoma Statutes Annotated title 21, § 1289.13, is a law similar to Nebraska Revised Statutes § 37-522 within the meaning of Nebraska Revised Statutes § 69-2433(8).
  2. Whether the district court properly considered the legislative intent and primary purpose of Nebraska's Concealed Handgun Permit Act.

Holdings

  1. Oklahoma Statutes Annotated title 21, § 1289.13, is a law similar to Nebraska Revised Statutes § 37-522 because both prohibit transporting loaded guns on a highway. Consequently, Shurigar's Oklahoma conviction disqualified him from obtaining a concealed handgun permit under § 69-2433(8).
  2. The district court properly considered the legislative intent and primary purpose of § 69-2433. The statute is not limited to convictions involving crimes of violence; it also disqualifies persons convicted of specified firearm-related or unlawful-use-of-a-weapon laws, including similar laws of another jurisdiction.

Key quotations

Both statutes prohibit the transportation of loaded guns on a highway. (at 610)
We find that this constitutes “characteristics in common” and that Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1289.13, is a law “similar” to § 37-522 within the meaning of § 69-24333. (at 610)

Factual background

Shurigar applied for a Nebraska concealed handgun permit and disclosed that he had pleaded guilty in Oklahoma to transporting a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle. The Oklahoma statute prohibited transporting a loaded pistol, rifle, or shotgun in a motor vehicle over a public highway or roadway. The Nebraska State Patrol determined that the conviction was under a law similar to Nebraska Revised Statutes § 37-522 and therefore disqualified Shurigar under § 69-2433(8).

Procedural history

The Nebraska State Patrol denied Shurigar's concealed handgun permit application because of his Oklahoma conviction for transporting a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle. After an administrative hearing, the State Patrol again denied the application. The Lancaster County District Court affirmed, and the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the district court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…