Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court held that a will containing preprinted, typewritten, and handwritten portions satisfied the statutory requirement that a will be in writing. Because the document was signed by the testator and witnessed by two individuals, it was validly executed under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2327, making analysis under the holographic-will statute unnecessary. The court reversed the denial of formal probate and remanded with instructions to admit the will.
Holdings
- A document purporting to be a will satisfies § 30-2327's "in writing" requirement when it is otherwise sufficient, even if it is partly printed, partly typewritten, and partly handwritten, so long as the forms of writing substantively evidence testamentary intent.
- When a will satisfies § 30-2327, it is validly executed, and further examination under the holographic-will statute is unnecessary.
Questions Presented
- Whether a will containing preprinted, typewritten, and handwritten portions satisfies the statutory requirement that a will be "in writing" under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2327.
- Whether the county court erred by treating the document as a holographic will and denying formal probate under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2328.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- In re Estate of Balvin, 295 Neb. 346, 888 N.W.2d 499 (2016)(followed)
- In re Estate of Flider, 213 Neb. 153, 328 N.W.2d 197 (1982)(followed)
- Cummings v. Curtiss, 219 Neb. 106, 361 N.W.2d 508 (1985)(followed)
- In re Estate of Foxley, 254 Neb. 204, 575 N.W.2d 150 (1998)(distinguished)
- Stuck v. Howard, 213 Ala. 184, 104 So. 500 (1925)(noted)
- Reynolds v. Massey, 219 Ala. 265, 122 So. 29 (1929)(noted)
- Succession of Bellanca v. Schiro, 517 So. 2d 1235 (La. App. 1987)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…