State v. Phillips

297 Neb. 469 (2017) · Nebraska Supreme Court · August 11, 2017 · No. No. S-16-845

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed Christian E. Phillips’ conviction and sentence for failing to register as required by the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court held that the 12-month imprisonment term was not excessive and that Phillips waived constitutional objections to the conditions of his 12-month term of postrelease supervision because he had notice of the conditions and an opportunity to challenge them.

Holdings

  1. A sentence within statutory limits is not excessive where the sentencing court properly considers the relevant sentencing factors and applicable legal principles; Phillips's 12-month sentence was within the statutory range and was not an abuse of discretion.
  2. A defendant waives objections to postrelease-supervision conditions when the defendant was adequately informed of the conditions and had an opportunity to challenge them but failed to specify sufficient objections.
  3. For the determinate sentence imposed in this case, the district court properly imposed both a term of imprisonment and a term of postrelease supervision with conditions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Phillips's 12-month term of imprisonment for failure to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act was excessive.
  2. Whether Phillips preserved objections to the conditions of his postrelease supervision and, if so, whether those conditions violated the First Amendment, ex post facto protections, the Fourth Amendment, due process, or rehabilitation-related limits.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • State v. Dixon, 286 Neb. 334, 837 N.W.2d 496 (2013)(followed)
  • State v. Loding, 296 Neb. 670, 895 N.W.2d 669 (2017)(followed)
  • State v. Dominguez, 290 Neb. 477, 860 N.W.2d 732 (2015)(followed)
  • State v. Marrs, 272 Neb. 573, 723 N.W.2d 499 (2006)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…