Edward Wintroub v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

303 Neb. 15 (2019) · Nebraska Supreme Court · May 3, 2019 · No. S-18-142

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Nationstar Mortgage LLC in a dispute over the priority of a mortgage lender's interest against purchasers' interest under an executory land contract. The court held that subordination agreements are generally enforceable in land contracts and that the clause at issue unambiguously subordinated the purchasers' rights to the seller's lender and its successors and assigns.

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
Freudenberg, J.; Heavican, C.J.; Miller-Lerman, J.; Cassel, J.; Stacy, J.; Funke, J.; Papik, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
May 3, 2019
Docket number
S-18-142
Procedural posture
Appeal from an order granting Nationstar Mortgage LLC's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Wintroub's action seeking to enjoin a trustee sale and establish priority of his interest in the property.
Standard of review
Summary judgment is reviewed to determine whether the pleadings, depositions, admissions, stipulations, and affidavits disclose any genuine issue of material fact or ultimate inference and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted, with that party receiving the benefit of all reasonable inferences. Contract interpretation and whether a contract is ambiguous are reviewed independently as questions of law.
Precedential value
Published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Edward Wintroub v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

mortgagescontract interpretationcontractssummary judgmentappellate procedure

Practice areas

real estatemortgagescontractscivil procedureappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment on the priority of Wintroub's land-contract interest relative to Nationstar's mortgage.
  2. Whether the land contract's subordination clause was enforceable against Wintroub and subordinated his interest to the mortgage held by Nationstar and its predecessors and assignees.
  3. Whether the subordination clause was ambiguous.

Holdings

  1. A subordination agreement contained in a contract for the sale and purchase of land is generally enforceable under Nebraska law.
  2. The subordination clause was unambiguous and subordinated the Wintroubs' rights and interest to the rights of the seller's lenders until the contract price was paid in full. The subordination extended to Lehman Brothers Bank's mortgage and its successors and assignees, including Nationstar.
  3. Summary judgment was proper because no genuine issue of material fact remained regarding the operation of the subordination clause or the priority of Nationstar's mortgage.

Key quotations

We hold that generally, a subordination agreement set forth within a contract for the sale and purchase of land is enforceable. (303 Neb. at 21-22)
An instrument is ambiguous if a word, phrase, or provision in the instrument has, or is susceptible of, at least two reasonable but conflicting interpretations or meanings. (303 Neb. at 22)
There is no genuine issue that under the subordination clause, Nationstar’s mortgage has priority over Wintroub’s interest. (303 Neb. at 23)

Factual background

Edward Wintroub and his wife entered into a land contract with the Steve Faller Revocable Trust to purchase a residence. The land contracts provided that, until all amounts due were paid, the land contract would be subordinated to any rights held by the seller's lender. Shortly after the first land contract, the trust executed a promissory note and deed of trust to Lehman Brothers Bank to refinance an existing mortgage and pay a construction lien; the note and deed of trust were later assigned to Nationstar. The Wintroubs did not timely pay the contract price, the trust defaulted on the loan, and Wintroub sought to enjoin the scheduled trustee sale.

Procedural history

Wintroub filed suit in the Douglas County District Court to enjoin a trustee sale, asserting that his interest under a land contract was superior to Nationstar's mortgage interest. The district court granted Nationstar summary judgment, concluding that the mortgage had priority under the land contract's subordination clause and that the priority extended to Nationstar as assignee. Wintroub appealed, and the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…