Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court held that a partial summary judgment constituted a final submission as to one claim, depriving the plaintiffs of the statutory right to voluntarily dismiss the entire action without prejudice under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-601. The court further held that the district court had authority to vacate the dismissal and reinstate the case. The dismissal order was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- The district court's order dismissing the case completely disposed of the subject matter and affected a substantial right, making it a final, appealable order.
- A partial summary judgment constitutes a final submission as to the claim resolved by the judgment. After such a final submission, the plaintiff lacks the statutory right to voluntarily dismiss the entire action without prejudice, although the plaintiff retains the right to dismiss claims that have not been finally submitted.
- The district court had jurisdiction to consider and grant the motion to vacate and reinstate the case, and its reinstatement order was not a nullity.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court's dismissal order was a final, appealable order.
- Whether a partial summary judgment constituted a final submission that deprived plaintiffs of the statutory right to voluntarily dismiss the entire action without prejudice under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-601.
- Whether the district court retained authority to vacate its dismissal order and reinstate the case under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2001(1).
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (32)
- In re Grand Jury of Douglas Cty., 302 Neb. 128, 922 N.W.2d 226 (2019)(followed)
- Kibler v. Kibler, 287 Neb. 1027, 845 N.W.2d 585 (2014)(followed)
- Millard Gutter Co. v. American Family Ins. Co., 300 Neb. 466, 915 N.W.2d 58 (2018)(followed)
- Big John's Billiards v. State, 283 Neb. 496, 811 N.W.2d 205 (2012)(followed)
- State v. Vela, 272 Neb. 287, 721 N.W.2d 631 (2006)(followed)
- Boyd v. Cook, 298 Neb. 819, 906 N.W.2d 31 (2018)(followed)
- Beals v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 53 Neb. 601, 74 N.W. 54 (1898)(followed)
- Sharpless v. Giffen, 47 Neb. 146, 66 N.W. 285 (1896)(followed)
- Holste v. Burlington Northern RR. Co., 256 Neb. 713, 592 N.W.2d 894 (1999)(followed)
- Horton v. State, 63 Neb. 34, 88 N.W. 146 (1901)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 32.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…