Vejraska v. Pumphrey

241 Neb. 321 (1992) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · August 28, 1992 · No. S-89-861

Summary

This Nebraska Supreme Court case addresses whether a great-niece acting as an attorney-in-fact improperly converted estate funds by placing a $5,000 check into a joint certificate of deposit after the principal's death. The court applied the rule that an agent cannot make a gift to themselves unless expressly authorized by the power of attorney instrument and supported by clear evidence of the principal's intent. Reviewing the record de novo, the court found insufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of abuse of fiduciary duty and affirmed the trial court's judgment imposing liability on the defendant.

Court
Supreme Court of Nebraska
Writing for the Court
GRANT; HASTINGS, C.J.; BOSLAUGH; WHITE; CAPORALE; SHANAHAN; FAHRNBRUCH
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
August 28, 1992
Docket number
S-89-861
Procedural posture
Appeal from trial court judgment awarding $5,000 to plaintiff and ordering defendant to pay costs.
Standard of review
de novo
Precedential value
published
Parties
Susan M. Pumphrey v. Lavern Vejraska
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

constructive trusttruststrust administrationprobate procedureequitable relief

Practice areas

trustsprobate

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the decedent intended to make a gift of $5,000 to the defendant.
  2. Whether the plaintiff proved the elements required to impose a constructive trust on the certificate of deposit.

Holdings

  1. The plaintiff failed to prove by clear, convincing evidence that the decedent intended to make a gift; therefore no gift was established.
  2. The plaintiff did not meet the burden of proof for a constructive trust; the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Key quotations

The burden of proof is upon one seeking to establish the existence of a constructive trust to do so by evidence which is clear, satisfactory, and convincing in character.
We adopted the following reasoning from the South Carolina Supreme Court: "Effectively, absent express intention, an agent may not utilize his position for his or a third party's personal benefit in a substantially gratuitous transfer."

Factual background

The decedent, Nicholas Vogltanz, gave a $5,000 check to his great‑niece Susan M. Pumphrey, who was his attorney‑in‑fact under a durable power of attorney. Pumphrey deposited the check in a joint certificate of deposit, retained the money after Vogltanz’s death, and did not disclose the deposit to the estate’s personal representative.

Procedural history

The trial court found for the plaintiff, awarding $5,000 and ordering costs. The defendant appealed, challenging the findings on gift intent, constructive trust, and undue influence.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Nebraska Supreme Court