Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed whether an arbitration award in a construction contract dispute contained an evident miscalculation of figures warranting modification under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614(a)(1). The court held that an evident miscalculation requires an obvious and unambiguous mathematical error, and that the alleged inconsistency in the arbitrator’s damage categories did not meet that standard. The court affirmed confirmation of the arbitration award.
Holdings
- An evident miscalculation of figures exists only when the arbitration award contains a mathematical error that is both obvious and unambiguous.
- The award did not contain an evident miscalculation because any possible duplication or inconsistency was not clear, conclusive, or undisputable from the face of the award.
Questions Presented
- What constitutes an evident miscalculation of figures under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2614(a)(1) for purposes of modifying or correcting an arbitration award?
- Did the arbitrator's award contain an obvious and unambiguous mathematical error warranting modification or correction?
- Was the district court clearly erroneous in finding that the Summit Group failed to establish an evident miscalculation?
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (17)
- Dowd v. First Omaha Securities Corp., 242 Neb. 347, 495 N.W.2d 36 (1993)(followed)
- Father Flanagan's Boys' Home v. Agnew, 256 Neb. 394, 590 N.W.2d 688 (1999)(followed)
- FirsTier Bank v. Triplett, 242 Neb. 614, 497 N.W.2d 339 (1993)(followed)
- Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Industries, Inc., 783 F.2d 743 (8th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- McIlroy v. PaineWebber, Inc., 989 F.2d 817 (5th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Valentine Sugars, Inc. v. Donau Corp., 981 F.2d 210 (5th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- National Post Office v. U.S. Postal Service, 751 F.2d 834 (6th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Apex Plumbing Supply v. U.S. Supply Co., 142 F.3d 188 (4th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Atlantic Aviation, Inc. v. EBM Group, Inc., 11 F.3d 1276 (5th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Foust v. Aetna Casualty & Insurance Co., 786 P.2d 450 (Colo. App. 1989)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…