Budler v. General Motors Corp.

268 Neb. 998 (2004) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · December 17, 2004 · No. No. S-04-096

Summary

The Supreme Court of Nebraska answered a certified question from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concerning whether Nebraska's ten-year products-liability statute of repose is tolled by a plaintiff's minority. The court held that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-224(2), including its notwithstanding clause, is not tolled by the infancy provision in § 25-213.

Holdings

  1. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-224(2) (Reissue 1995) is not tolled by a person's status as a minor under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-213 (Reissue 1995).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ten-year statute of repose for products liability actions in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-224(2) (Reissue 1995) is tolled by a claimant's minority under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-213 (Reissue 1995).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (12)

  • Brown v. Kindred, 259 Neb. 95, 608 N.W.2d 577 (2000)(followed)
  • Lawson v. Ford Motor Co., 225 Neb. 725, 408 N.W.2d 256 (1987)(followed)
  • Sacchi v. Blodig, 215 Neb. 817, 341 N.W.2d 326 (1983)(followed)
  • Macku v. Drackett Products Co., 216 Neb. 176, 343 N.W.2d 58 (1984)(distinguished)
  • Stuart v. American Cyanamid Co., 158 F.3d 622 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1065, 119 S. Ct. 1456, 143 L. Ed. 2d 543 (1999)(followed)
  • Givens v. Anchor Packing, 237 Neb. 565, 466 N.W.2d 771 (1991)(followed)
  • Hoiengs v. County of Adams, 254 Neb. 64, 574 N.W.2d 498 (1998)(followed)
  • Woodhouse Ford v. Laflan, 268 Neb. 722, 687 N.W.2d 672 (2004)(followed)
  • In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Woltemath, 268 Neb. 33, 680 N.W.2d 142 (2004)(followed)
  • Governor's Policy Research Office v. KN Energy, 264 Neb. 924, 652 N.W.2d 865 (2002)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…