Summary
The Supreme Court of Nebraska held that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a divorce proceeding because the record did not establish that the Nebraska-resident spouse intended to make Nebraska her permanent home. The court vacated the dissolution decree and dismissed the action, declining to address personal jurisdiction.
Holdings
- When both parties are foreign citizens and the party residing in Nebraska has done so on a visitor's visa, the ordinary inference that satisfaction of the divorce residency-duration requirement reflects an intent to make Nebraska a permanent home is negated; specific evidence of permanent-home intent is required. Because Rozsnyai presented no such evidence beyond the length of her residence, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
- The court did not need to address personal jurisdiction because the lack of subject matter jurisdiction independently required vacatur and dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Nebraska district court had subject matter jurisdiction over Rozsnyai's dissolution-of-marriage proceeding when Rozsnyai was a Canadian citizen residing in Nebraska on a visitor's visa and the evidence did not otherwise establish an intent to make Nebraska her permanent home.
- Whether the district court had personal jurisdiction over Svacek.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (10)
- Diversified Telecom Servs. v. Clevinger, 268 Neb. 388, 683 N.W.2d 338 (2004)(followed)
- Ptak v. Swanson, 271 Neb. 57, 709 N.W.2d 337 (2006)(followed)
- State ex rel. Storz v. Storz, 235 Neb. 368, 455 N.W.2d 182 (1990)(followed)
- Rector v. Rector, 224 Neb. 800, 401 N.W.2d 167 (1987)(limited)
- Jones v. Union P. R. Co., 141 Neb. 112, 2 N.W.2d 624 (1942)(followed)
- Alves v. Alves, 262 A.2d 111 (D.C. App. 1970)(followed)
- Weber v. Weber, 929 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. App. 2006)(followed)
- Perez v. Perez, 164 So. 2d 561 (Fla. App. 1964)(followed)
- Bustamante v. Bustamante, 645 P.2d 40 (Utah 1982)(followed)
- Gary's Implement v. Bridgeport Tractor Parts, 270 Neb. 286, 702 N.W.2d 355 (2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…