Simms v. Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.

725 N.W.2d 406, 272 Neb. 744 (2006) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · December 15, 2006 · No. No. S-05-827

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court held that a wife's settlement and release of her personal injury claim did not bar her husband's separate loss of consortium claim. Although the consortium claim is derivative of the injured spouse's harm, it is a distinct personal legal claim that the injured spouse did not release absent evidence of authority to do so. The court affirmed the district court's reversal of summary judgment for Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.

Court
Supreme Court of Nebraska
Writing for the Court
McCormack, J.; Wright, J.; Connolly, J.; Gerrard, J.; Stephan, J.; Miller-Lerman, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
December 15, 2006
Docket number
No. S-05-827
Procedural posture
Vicorp appealed from the district court's reversal of a county court order granting summary judgment to Vicorp in Simms' loss of consortium action.
Standard of review
Questions of law are reviewed independently of the conclusion reached by the trial court.
Precedential value
Published opinion of the Supreme Court of Nebraska; binding precedent in Nebraska.
Parties
Vicorp Restaurants, Inc. v. Gary Simms
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

loss of consortiumsummary judgmentpersonal injurytortscivil procedure

Practice areas

tortspersonal injurycivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an injured spouse's settlement and release of her individual claims bars the other spouse's separate loss of consortium claim.
  2. Whether Johnston v. State required that Simms commence his loss of consortium claim before the injured spouse's claim was extinguished.

Holdings

  1. An injured spouse's release of her individual personal injury claims does not bar the other spouse's independent loss of consortium claim when the other spouse did not sign or join the release and there is no evidence that the releasing spouse had authority to release the other spouse's claim.
  2. Johnston v. State does not control whether an injured spouse's release bars the other spouse's loss of consortium claim because Johnston involved the exclusive-remedy provisions of workers' compensation law and is factually distinguishable.

Key quotations

We find, therefore, that Dianna's release does not bar Simms' independent claim for loss of consortium. (409)
Although a loss of consortium claim derives from the harm suffered by the injured spouse, see Johnston v. State, 219 Neb. 457, 364 N.W.2d 1 (1985), it remains a personal legal claim which is separate and distinct from those claims belonging to the injured spouse, see Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc., supra. (409)

Factual background

Dianna Simms was injured in a slip-and-fall accident at a Village Inn restaurant owned by Vicorp. She settled her personal injury claim with Vicorp and signed a document captioned "Release of All Claims." Gary Simms knew of the settlement and release but did not sign or join the release, did not assign his loss of consortium claim to Dianna, and did not release his separate claim.

Procedural history

Gary Simms brought a loss of consortium claim after his wife settled her personal injury claim against Vicorp and executed a release. The Lancaster County Court dismissed Simms' claim and entered summary judgment for Vicorp. The Lancaster County District Court reversed, concluding that the wife's settlement and release did not bar Simms' claim. The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the district court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…