Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court held that written settlement offers made by an insurer were not equivalent to offers to allow judgment under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-901. Because the insurer did not make qualifying offers to allow judgment, the statute did not preclude the insureds from seeking attorney fees under § 44-359. The court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A written settlement offer is not equivalent to an offer in writing to allow judgment under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-901. To invoke the statute's protection, the offer must expressly comply with the statutory requirement of offering to allow judgment against the defendant.
- Because Midwest did not make an offer to allow judgment as required by § 25-901, that statute did not preclude the Youngs from pursuing attorney fees otherwise available under § 44-359.
Questions Presented
- Whether written settlement offers that do not expressly offer to allow judgment constitute offers to allow judgment under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-901.
- Whether Midwest's settlement offers barred the Youngs from recovering attorney fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-359.
- Whether the district court erred by denying the Youngs' attorney-fee request.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- Genthon v. Kratville, 270 Neb. 74, 701 N.W.2d 334 (2005)(followed)
- Wendt v. Cavalier Ins. Corp., 197 Neb. 622, 250 N.W.2d 243 (1977)(distinguished)
- Haberkorn v. Chrysler Corp., 210 Mich. App. 354, 533 N.W.2d 373 (1995)(followed)
- B & H Const. v. Tallahassee Community College, 542 So. 2d 382 (Fla. App. 1989)(followed)
- Becker v. DeLeone, 78 Or. App. 530, 717 P.2d 1185 (1986)(followed)
- 24th & Dodge Ltd. Part. v. Acceptance Ins. Co., 269 Neb. 31, 690 N.W.2d 769 (2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…