St. Monica's v. Lancaster County Board of Equalization

751 N.W.2d 604, 275 Neb. 999 (2008) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · June 27, 2008 · No. No. S-07-1031

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the denial of St. Monica's application for a property tax exemption. The court held that Nebraska law requires exempt use to be determined as of the application date, and St. Monica's intended future charitable use of the property did not satisfy that requirement. The court also held that ownership alone was not evidence of exempt use and that St. Monica's would have needed to reapply after the property was put to an exempt use.

Court
Supreme Court of Nebraska
Writing for the Court
Heavican, C.J.; Wright, J.; Connolly, J.; Gerrard, J.; Stephan, J.; McCormack, J.; Miller-Lerman, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
June 27, 2008
Docket number
No. S-07-1031
Procedural posture
St. Monica's appealed the Tax Equalization and Review Commission's decision upholding the Lancaster County Board of Equalization's denial of its application for a property tax exemption.
Standard of review
TERC decisions are reviewed for errors appearing on the record. The appellate court determines whether the decision conforms to law, is supported by competent evidence, and is not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. Questions of law are reviewed de novo on the record.
Precedential value
Published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion
Parties
St. Monica's v. Lancaster County Board of Equalization
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

property taxadministrative lawappellate procedurestandard of reviewstatutory interpretation

Practice areas

property taxadministrative lawappellate procedurestatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether TERC erred in upholding the denial of St. Monica's application for a 2005 property tax exemption when the property was not being used for an exempt purpose on the application date.
  2. Whether St. Monica's later acquisition of building permits and subsequent use of the property eliminated the need to file a new exemption application.

Holdings

  1. A property's intended future use for an exempt purpose is not itself an exempt use under Nebraska's property-tax-exemption statute. Because St. Monica's property was not being used exclusively for an exempt purpose on March 28, 2005, its application for the 2005 tax year was properly denied.
  2. Ownership of the property is not evidence of exempt use, and later obtaining building permits or beginning exempt use did not excuse St. Monica's from filing a new exemption application. Any later exemption had to be considered anew based on the property's use as of the date of a new application.

Key quotations

This court has consistently held that the "intention to use property in the future for an exempt purpose is not a use of the property for [exempt] purposes." (607)
The ownership of property is not evidence of use under the statute. (607)

Factual background

St. Monica's, a Nebraska nonprofit corporation providing charitable substance-abuse and mental-health treatment for women, purchased property in Lincoln on March 15, 2005, intending to convert it into treatment, outpatient, and administrative facilities. It applied for a property tax exemption on March 28, 2005, when the property was not yet occupied or otherwise being used for the claimed charitable purposes. Although it obtained building permits on July 21 and began occupying the property in October, it did not reapply for the 2005 exemption.

Procedural history

St. Monica's applied for a property tax exemption on March 28, 2005, but the Lancaster County Board of Equalization denied the application because the property was not then being used for an exempt purpose. St. Monica's later obtained building permits and began occupying the property in October 2005, but the record did not show that it reapplied for an exemption for the 2005 tax year. After an earlier jurisdictional dismissal was summarily reversed, the matter was submitted to TERC without a hearing, and TERC upheld the Board's decision on September 12. St. Monica's appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court, which affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…