Butler County School District 12-0502 v. Freeholder Petitioners 1 through 10: Fern Jansa et al.

Butler Cty. Sch. Dist. v. Freeholder Petitioners, 286 Neb. 814 (2013) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · November 8, 2013 · No. No. S-13-123

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s determination that a county freeholder board had jurisdiction over petitions seeking to transfer property between school districts. The court held that the common-law prior jurisdiction rule did not apply because the school-district merger proceedings and the freeholder petition proceedings were not equivalent. The court also affirmed the district court’s judgment upholding the Board’s order granting the freeholder petitions.

Holdings

  1. The prior jurisdiction rule does not apply because the school-district merger proceeding and the freeholder property-transfer proceeding were not equivalent proceedings.
  2. The freeholder board had jurisdiction over the freeholders' petitions, and the district court correctly affirmed the board's order.
  3. When a jurisdictional question presents no factual dispute, an appellate court determines it as a matter of law and independently reviews the lower court's legal conclusions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the common-law prior jurisdiction rule applied when a school-district merger proceeding and freeholder property-transfer proceeding involved the same territory.
  2. Whether the Saunders County freeholder board had jurisdiction to hear and grant the freeholders' petitions.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Butler Cty. Sch. Dist. v. Freeholder Petitioners, 283 Neb. 903, 814 N.W.2d 724 (2012)(followed)
  • Holdsworth v. Greenwood Farmers Co-op., 286 Neb. 49, 835 N.W.2d 30 (2013)(followed)
  • Pinnacle Enters. v. City of Papillion, 286 Neb. 322, 836 N.W.2d 588 (2013)(followed)
  • City of Elkhorn v. City of Omaha, 272 Neb. 867, 725 N.W.2d 792 (2007)(applied by analogy)
  • State v. Reorganized District No. 11, 307 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. 1957)(cited)
  • Yandle v. Mecklenburg County and Mecklenburg County v. Town of Matthews, 85 N.C. App. 382, 355 S.E.2d 216 (1987)(followed by analogy)
  • City of Burlington v. Town of Elon College, 310 N.C. 723, 314 S.E.2d 534 (1984)(followed)
  • Nicholson v. Red Willow Cty. Sch. Dist. No. 0170, 270 Neb. 140, 699 N.W.2d 25 (2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…