Platte River Whooping Crane Maintenance Trust, Inc. v. Hall County Board of Equalization

298 Neb. 970 (2018) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · February 9, 2018 · No. S-17-389

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court held that the Platte River Whooping Crane Maintenance Trust qualified as a charitable organization under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-202(1)(d). The court concluded that the subject properties were used exclusively for charitable purposes and were not owned or used for financial gain or profit, reversing the Tax Equalization and Review Commission and remanding with directions to grant the property tax exemption.

Holdings

  1. A conservation organization may qualify as a charitable organization under § 77-202(1)(d) when it operates exclusively for the mental, social, or physical benefit of the public and otherwise satisfies the statutory exemption requirements.
  2. The subject properties were used exclusively for charitable purposes because the Crane Trust's primary or dominant use was conservation and public education, and conservation activities provided public mental, social, and physical benefits.
  3. The cattle-grazing lease did not disqualify the properties from exemption because the income was not distributed to owners, members, officers, directors, or private individuals, and the grazing was incidental to the primary charitable conservation use.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a conservation organization may qualify as a charitable organization under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-202(1)(d).
  2. Whether the subject properties were used exclusively for charitable purposes.
  3. Whether cattle-grazing lease income meant that the properties were owned or used for financial gain or profit.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Cain v. Custer Cty. Bd. of Equal., 291 Neb. 730, 868 N.W.2d 334 (2015)(applied)
  • Creighton St. Joseph Hosp. v. Tax Eq. & Rev. Comm., 260 Neb. 905, 620 N.W.2d 90 (2000)(applied)
  • Fort Calhoun Bapt. Ch. v. Washington Cty. Bd. of Eq., 277 Neb. 25, 759 N.W.2d 475 (2009)(applied)
  • Neb. State Bar Found. v. Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal., 237 Neb. 1, 465 N.W.2d 111 (1991)(applied)
  • Bethesda Found. v. Buffalo Cty. Bd. of Equal., 263 Neb. 454, 640 N.W.2d 398 (2002)(applied)
  • Francis Small Heritage v. Town of Limington, 98 A.3d 1012 (Me. 2014)(persuasive)
  • Turner v. Trust for Public Land, 445 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. App. 1984)(persuasive)
  • New England Forestry v. Board of Assessors, 468 Mass. 138, 9 N.E.3d 310 (2014)(persuasive)
  • Pecos River Open Spaces, Inc. v. Cnty. of San Miguel, 2013 NMCA 029, ___ P.3d ___ (2013)(persuasive)
  • Little Miami v. Kinney, 68 Ohio St. 2d 102, 428 N.E.2d 859 (1981)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…