Hassan v. Trident Seafoods

302 Neb. 44 (2019) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · January 11, 2019 · No. No. S-18-255

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of Abdi Hassan’s workers’ compensation claim for lack of jurisdiction. The court held that Trident Seafoods, a nonresident employer, was not performing work in Nebraska within the meaning of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act merely because it conducted occasional worker-recruitment activities there.

Holdings

  1. The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court lacked jurisdiction because Trident Seafoods was not a statutory employer subject to the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act.
  2. The court did not need to decide whether Hassan was a covered statutory employee because the absence of a statutory employer was independently dispositive.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court had jurisdiction over Hassan’s claim when Trident Seafoods was a nonresident employer whose Nebraska activities consisted primarily of occasional recruitment for work performed in Alaska.
  2. Whether Trident Seafoods was a statutory employer under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-106(1) and related provisions of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (3)

  • Bower v. Eaton Corp., 301 Neb. 311, 918 N.W.2d 249 (2018)(followed)
  • Jensen v. Floair, Inc., 212 Neb. 740, 326 N.W.2d 19 (1982)(followed)
  • Morin v. Industrial Manpower, 13 Neb. Ct. App. 1, 687 N.W.2d 704 (2004)(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…