Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed the dismissal of Shadow Ridge Limited Partnership’s claim against the estate of Wayne L. Ryan based on an unfulfilled $20 million pledge agreement. The court held that Shadow Ridge, a for-profit golf course partnership, failed to state an enforceable contract claim because it was not a charitable, educational, or like institution. However, its allegations that it incurred substantial expenses in reliance on the pledge were sufficient to state a promissory estoppel claim, so the dismissal was affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.
Holdings
- The nonoccurrence of conditions precedent did not automatically defeat Shadow Ridge's contingent claim against the estate. The Nebraska Probate Code requires contingent claims to be presented within the applicable statutory periods and provides mechanisms for their disposition if the contingencies remain unresolved.
- Shadow Ridge failed to state a contract claim because it did not allege that it was a charitable, educational, or like institution entitled to enforce a gratuitous pledge under the charitable-subscription exception to the general rule against enforcing promises to make future gifts.
- Shadow Ridge stated a claim for promissory estoppel by alleging that Ryan made a promise that he should reasonably have expected to induce action, that Shadow Ridge reasonably relied on the promise, and that it incurred substantial expenses in reliance.
Questions Presented
- Whether the contingent nature of the pledge agreement prevented Shadow Ridge from presenting a claim against Ryan's estate in the probate proceeding.
- Whether Shadow Ridge, a limited partnership operating a golf course, stated a claim to enforce Ryan's pledge agreement as a contract despite the general rule that promises to make future gifts are unenforceable.
- Whether Shadow Ridge stated a claim for promissory estoppel by alleging that Ryan's promise reasonably induced it to incur substantial expenses in reliance on the promise.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (14)
- Sandoval v. Ricketts, 302 Neb. 138, 922 N.W.2d 222 (2019)(followed)
- In re Interest of Noah B. et al., 295 Neb. 764, 891 N.W.2d 109 (2017)(followed)
- Eadie v. Leise Properties, 300 Neb. 141, 912 N.W.2d 715 (2018)(followed)
- Burklund v. Fuehrer, 299 Neb. 949, 911 N.W.2d 843 (2018)(followed)
- Weber v. North Loup River Pub. Power, 288 Neb. 959, 854 N.W.2d 263 (2014)(followed)
- Ferer v. Aaron Ferer & Sons Co., 273 Neb. 701, 732 N.W.2d 667 (2007)(followed)
- Ricketts v. Scothorn, 57 Neb. 51, 77 N.W. 365 (1898)(followed)
- Blinn v. Beatrice Community Hosp. & Health Ctr., 270 Neb. 809, 708 N.W.2d 235 (2006)(followed)
- Trustees of Baker University v. Clelland, 86 F.2d 14 (8th Cir. 1936)(followed)
- Nebraska Wesleyan University v. Estate of Couch, 170 Neb. 518, 103 N.W.2d 274 (1960)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…