Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a marital dissolution decree awarding the parties shared legal and physical custody, allocating child-related expenses, dividing pension interests, and ordering Sharon Leners to pay attorney fees. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding Stacy Leners his railroad pension, establishing the parenting schedule, allocating expenses, or awarding fees based on vexatious conduct during the litigation.
Holdings
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding Stacy his railroad pension as his separate property in the overall equitable division of the marital estate, even though the court overstated Sharon's potential divorced-spouse annuity and miscalculated the divisible portion of Stacy's pension.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding the parties shared legal and physical custody and a parenting-time schedule providing Stacy substantial and equal parenting time.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by requiring the parties to share medical expenses equally and to share extracurricular expenses only when mutually agreed upon in writing.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering Sharon to pay Stacy $9,000 in attorney fees.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court improperly interpreted federal railroad retirement law or abused its discretion by awarding Stacy his railroad pension as his separate property rather than dividing the divisible Tier II benefits.
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by awarding shared legal and physical custody and equal parenting time.
- Whether the decree adequately allocated the parties' responsibility for the children's reasonable and necessary expenses, including extracurricular activities.
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by awarding Stacy $9,000 in attorney fees.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (12)
- Wiedel v. Wiedel, 300 Neb. 13, 911 N.W.2d 582 (2018)(followed)
- Gerber v. P & L Finance Co., 301 Neb. 463, 919 N.W.2d 116 (2018)(followed)
- Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572, 99 S. Ct. 802, 59 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1979)(followed)
- Shearer v. Shearer, 270 Neb. 178, 700 N.W.2d 580 (2005)(followed)
- McGraw v. McGraw, 186 W. Va. 113, 411 S.E.2d 256 (1991)(followed)
- Webster v. Webster, 271 Neb. 788, 716 N.W.2d 47 (2006)(followed)
- Vogel v. Vogel, 262 Neb. 1030, 637 N.W.2d 611 (2002)(followed)
- Connolly v. Connolly, 299 Neb. 103, 907 N.W.2d 693 (2018)(followed)
- Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123, 892 N.W.2d 100 (2017)(limited)
- State on behalf of Jakai C. v. Tiffany M., 292 Neb. 68, 871 N.W.2d 230 (2015)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…