Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed Nathan M. Thomas' convictions arising from electronically soliciting a police decoy whom he believed was under 16 years old. The court held that evidence of Thomas' sexually explicit online conversation with another 14-year-old was admissible under Nebraska Evidence Rule 404(2) to show motive and absence of mistake or accident, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
Holdings
- The Wolfgirl conversation was independently relevant to show Thomas's motive because motive may be relevant to the State's proof of intent, and intent was an element of the charged offense under § 28-833. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion by admitting the evidence for that limited purpose.
- The Wolfgirl conversation was independently relevant to show that Thomas was not mistaken about the recipient's stated age, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting it for that limited purpose.
- Although the Wolfgirl conversation was prejudicial in nature, its probative value was not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the exhibit as a whole.
- The evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to find that Thomas's communications offering to perform oral sex on a person he believed to be a 14-year-old child constituted indecent, lewd, lascivious, or obscene language or an offer or solicitation of an indecent or lewd act under § 28-833.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting Thomas's sexually explicit Wolfgirl conversation under Neb. Evid. R. 404(2) to prove motive and absence of mistake or accident.
- Whether the probative value of the Wolfgirl conversation was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice under Neb. R. Evid. 403.
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to establish that Thomas used or transmitted indecent, lewd, lascivious, or obscene language or offered or solicited an indecent or lewd act in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-833.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (17)
- State v. Kidder, 299 Neb. 232, 908 N.W.2d 1 (2018)(followed)
- State v. Mueller, 301 Neb. 778, 920 N.W.2d 424 (2018)(followed)
- State v. McGuire, 286 Neb. 494, 837 N.W.2d 767 (2013)(followed)
- State v. Sanchez, 257 Neb. 291, 597 N.W.2d 361 (1999)(distinguished)
- State v. Torres, 283 Neb. 142, 812 N.W.2d 213 (2012)(followed)
- State v. Payne-McCoy, 284 Neb. 302, 818 N.W.2d 608 (2012)(distinguished)
- State v. Trotter, 262 Neb. 443, 632 N.W.2d 325 (2001)(distinguished)
- State v. Phelps, 241 Neb. 707, 490 N.W.2d 676 (1992)(followed)
- State v. Oldson, 293 Neb. 718, 884 N.W.2d 10 (2016)(followed)
- U.S. v. Zahursky, 580 F.3d 515 (7th Cir. 2009)(persuasive)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…