Sellers v. Reefer Systems, Inc.

305 Neb. 868 (2020) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · May 22, 2020 · No. No. S-19-082

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court held that an employee seeking statutory appellate attorney fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125(4)(b) need not provide the details of the attorney-client fee agreement. The court concluded that the submitted affidavit sufficiently justified the extent and value of appellate services and reversed and remanded for determination of the reasonable fee amount.

Holdings

  1. The details of the attorney-client fee agreement are not a necessary component of an affidavit supporting a request for statutory reasonable attorney fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125(4)(b) and Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-109(F).
  2. Reasonable attorney fees under § 48-125(4)(b) are not dependent on the terms of an attorney-client fee agreement or on proof that the fees were incurred pursuant to that agreement.
  3. Sellers’ affidavit sufficiently justified the extent and value of the appellate services to permit a meaningful determination of reasonable attorney fees; a detailed log of every task and time entry was not required.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an affidavit supporting a request for statutory appellate attorney fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125(4)(b) and Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-109(F) must disclose the existence and terms of the attorney-client fee agreement.
  2. Whether Sellers’ affidavit sufficiently justified the extent and value of appellate legal services to permit a meaningful determination of reasonable attorney fees.
  3. Whether the Nebraska Court of Appeals abused its discretion by denying Sellers’ motion for appellate attorney fees.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (19)

  • Sellers v. Reefer Systems, No. A-19-082, 2019 WL 4940200 (Neb. App. Oct. 8, 2019)(prior proceeding)
  • Saylor v. State, 304 Neb. 779, 936 N.W.2d 924 (2020)(followed)
  • Hotz v. Hotz, 301 Neb. 102, 917 N.W.2d 467 (2018)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Peterson v. Creative Comm. Promotions, 302 Neb. 606, 924 N.W.2d 664 (2019)(followed)
  • Escobar v. JBS USA, 25 Neb. App. 527, 909 N.W.2d 373 (2018)(followed)
  • Dale Electronics, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 205 Neb. 115, 286 N.W.2d 437 (1979)(followed)
  • Black v. Brooks, 285 Neb. 440, 827 N.W.2d 256 (2013)(followed)
  • Stewart v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev., 294 Neb. 1010, 885 N.W.2d 723 (2016)(followed)
  • TransCanada Keystone Pipeline v. Nicholas Family, 299 Neb. 276, 908 N.W.2d 60 (2018)(distinguished)
  • Bortolotti v. Universal Terrazzo & Tile Co., 304 Neb. 219, 933 N.W.2d 851 (2019)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…