Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed an attorney disciplinary proceeding involving Jackie L. Barfield’s commingling of client funds with personal and business funds, use of an attorney trust account for personal expenses, and account overdrafts. The court held that the misconduct warranted disbarment, emphasizing the prolonged and routine nature of the violations and Barfield’s prior private reprimand. The court also addressed mitigating and aggravating factors in determining the appropriate sanction.
Holdings
- When neither party files exceptions to a referee's factual findings in an attorney-discipline proceeding, the Nebraska Supreme Court may adopt those findings as final and conclusive.
- The Nebraska Supreme Court reviews a referee's disciplinary recommendation de novo on the record because attorney-discipline cases are original proceedings before the court.
- An attorney violates the rule against commingling by intermingling client funds with the attorney's funds so that their separate identity is lost or the funds may be used for personal expenses or exposed to the attorney's creditors; good faith, ignorance, and absence of client loss do not excuse the violation.
- Disbarment is the appropriate sanction for prolonged, intentional, and routine commingling or misappropriation of client funds when the mitigating circumstances are not extraordinary and do not substantially outweigh aggravating circumstances.
Questions Presented
- What sanction was appropriate for Barfield's violations of Nebraska professional-conduct rules governing safekeeping client property and attorney misconduct?
- Whether Barfield's cooperation, remorse, affordable legal services, lack of client complaints, health concerns, and claimed lack of financial loss were sufficient mitigating circumstances to avoid disbarment.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (21)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Nimmer, 300 Neb. 906, 916 N.W.2d 732 (2018)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Thebarge, 289 Neb. 356, 854 N.W.2d 914 (2014)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Council, 289 Neb. 33, 853 N.W.2d 844 (2014)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Crawford, 285 Neb. 321, 827 N.W.2d 214 (2013)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Switzer, 280 Neb. 815, 790 N.W.2d 433 (2010)(followed)
- State ex rel. NSBA v. Howze, 260 Neb. 547, 618 N.W.2d 663 (2000)(followed)
- State ex rel. NSBA v. Malcom, 252 Neb. 263, 561 N.W.2d 237 (1997)(followed)
- State ex rel. NSBA v. Woodard, 249 Neb. 40, 541 N.W.2d 53 (1995)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Trembly, 300 Neb. 195, 912 N.W.2d 764 (2018)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Pierson, 281 Neb. 673, 798 N.W.2d 580 (2011)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…