Edwards v. Douglas County

308 Neb. 259 (2021) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · January 29, 2021 · No. No. S-19-1195

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of Julie Edwards's negligence action against Douglas County, holding that the claim was barred by the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act's exemption for claims arising out of assault. The court held that the exemption is jurisdictional and cannot be avoided through artful pleading alleging negligent handling of 911 calls. The court also concluded that the Emergency Telephone Communications Systems Act did not waive sovereign immunity.

Holdings

  1. A negligence claim against a political subdivision that seeks damages for personal injury stemming from an assault necessarily arises out of assault under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-910(7), regardless of how the claim is pleaded or whether the assailant was a governmental employee or a nongovernmental actor.
  2. The assault exemption is not limited to assaults committed by governmental employees; its plain text contains no such qualification.
  3. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-441 does not waive Douglas County's sovereign immunity.
  4. When a statutory exemption under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act applies, the political subdivision is immune from suit and the claim must be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Edwards's negligence claim based on Douglas County's alleged mishandling of 911 calls was barred by the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act exemption for any claim arising out of assault.
  2. Whether Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-441 of the Emergency Telephone Communications Systems Act independently waived Douglas County's sovereign immunity.
  3. Whether the Supreme Court could affirm the district court's dismissal on sovereign-immunity grounds even though the district court dismissed on the ground that the County owed Edwards no legal duty.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (20)

  • Moser v. State, 307 Neb. 18, 948 N.W.2d 194 (2020)(followed; Doe overruled)
  • Rutledge v. City of Kimball, 304 Neb. 593, 935 N.W.2d 746 (2019)(followed)
  • Britton v. City of Crawford, 282 Neb. 374, 803 N.W.2d 508 (2011)(followed)
  • Johnson v. State, 270 Neb. 316, 700 N.W.2d 620 (2005)(followed)
  • McKenna v. Julian, 277 Neb. 522, 763 N.W.2d 384 (2009)(followed; overruled in part by Doe; Doe later overruled)
  • Doe v. Omaha Pub. Sch. Dist., 273 Neb. 79, 727 N.W.2d 447 (2007)(overruled)
  • Sheridan v. United States, 487 U.S. 392, 108 S. Ct. 2449, 101 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1988)(distinguished; majority reasoning rejected in part)
  • United States v. Shearer, 473 U.S. 52, 105 S. Ct. 3039, 87 L. Ed. 2d 38 (1985)(followed by analogy)
  • Lambert v. Lincoln Pub. Schs., 306 Neb. 192, 945 N.W.2d 84 (2020)(followed)
  • Davis v. State, 297 Neb. 955, 902 N.W.2d 165 (2017)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…