Summary
The Supreme Court of Nevada held that an employee injured on the employer's premises within a reasonable interval before or after work may be eligible for workers' compensation under a premises-related exception to the going-and-coming rule. Brenda Cotton injured her ankle in MGM Mirage's parking area approximately ten minutes before her shift, and the court concluded that her injury arose out of and in the course of employment. The court affirmed the award of workers' compensation benefits.
Holdings
- Nevada recognizes a premises-related exception to the going-and-coming rule: an employee injured on the employer's premises while proceeding to or from work within a reasonable interval before or after work may be eligible for workers' compensation.
- Cotton's injury arose out of and in the course of her employment because she was injured on MGM's premises within a reasonable time before work and established a causal connection between the injury and the workplace environment.
- The appeals officer did not abuse her discretion or commit legal error by awarding Cotton workers' compensation benefits.
Questions Presented
- Whether Nevada should recognize a premises-related or parking-lot exception to the going-and-coming rule for workers' compensation claims.
- Whether Cotton's injury, sustained on her employer's premises approximately ten minutes before work while traversing a curb in the workplace environment, arose out of and in the course of her employment.
- Whether the appeals officer abused her discretion or committed legal error by awarding Cotton workers' compensation benefits.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (20)
- Construction Indus. v. Chalue, 119 Nev. 348, 74 P.3d 595 (2003)(followed)
- Bullock v. Pinnacle Risk Mgmt., 113 Nev. 1385, 951 P.2d 1036 (1997)(followed)
- Rio Suite Hotel & Casino v. Gorsky, 113 Nev. 600, 939 P.2d 1043 (1997)(followed)
- Provenzano v. Long, 64 Nev. 412, 183 P.2d 639 (1947)(followed)
- Nev. Industrial Comm. v. Dixon, 77 Nev. 296, 362 P.2d 577 (1961)(distinguished)
- National Convenience Stores v. Fantauzzi, 94 Nev. 655, 584 P.2d 689 (1978)(followed)
- Nevada Ind. Comm. v. Leonard, 58 Nev. 16, 68 P.2d 576 (1937)(followed)
- Tighe v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't, 110 Nev. 632, 877 P.2d 1032 (1994)(followed)
- Schepcoff v. SIIS, 109 Nev. 322, 849 P.2d 271 (1993)(followed)
- Costley v. Nevada Ind. Ins. Com., 53 Nev. 219, 296 P. 1011 (1931)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…