Valley Electric Ass'n v. Overfield, 121 Nev. 7

106 P.3d 1198 (2005) · Supreme Court of Nevada · March 10, 2005 · No. No. 41858

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court held that NRS 18.010 authorizes an award of attorney fees to defendants in eminent domain proceedings who recover $20,000 or less in just compensation. The court concluded that the landowners were prevailing parties and that their compensation award constituted a monetary judgment, affirming the district court's attorney-fee award.

Holdings

  1. NRS 18.010 authorizes an award of attorney fees to a condemnation defendant who recovers $20,000 or less in just compensation, when the award is warranted in the district court's sound discretion.
  2. A defendant in a condemnation action may qualify as a prevailing party under NRS 18.010.
  3. A condemnation judgment fixing the amount of just compensation qualifies as a monetary judgment for purposes of NRS 18.010.
  4. The district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding attorney fees because the respondents recovered less than $20,000, prevailed, and recovered substantially more than Valley Electric's settlement offer.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether NRS 18.010 authorizes a district court to award attorney fees to a defendant-landowner in a condemnation action when the landowner recovers $20,000 or less in just compensation.
  2. Whether condemnation defendants may qualify as a prevailing party under NRS 18.010 even though they did not initiate the action.
  3. Whether a condemnation judgment fixing just compensation qualifies as a monetary judgment for purposes of NRS 18.010.
  4. Whether the district court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees under the circumstances.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Parodi v. Budetti, 115 Nev. 236, 240, 984 P.2d 172, 174 (1999)(followed)
  • Trustees v. Developers Surety, 120 Nev. 56, 59, 84 P.3d 59, 61 (2004)(followed)
  • Las Vegas Downtown Redev. Agency v. Pappas, 119 Nev. 429, 441, 76 P.3d 1, 5 (2003)(followed)
  • Lamar v. Urban Renewal Agency, 84 Nev. 580, 581-82, 445 P.2d 869, 869-70 (1968)(followed)
  • United States v. Bodcaw Co., 440 U.S. 202, 204, 99 S. Ct. 1066, 59 L. Ed. 2d 257 (1979)(followed)
  • State v. Davis, 53 Haw. 582, 499 P.2d 663, 666 (Haw. 1972)(distinguished_from)
  • Women's Federal S & L Ass'n v. Nevada Nat. Bank, 623 F. Supp. 469, 470 (D. Nev. 1985)(followed)
  • Smith v. Crown Financial Services, 111 Nev. 277, 284-85, 890 P.2d 769, 773-74 (1995)(followed)
  • Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Pickering, 104 Nev. 660, 765 P.2d 181 (1988)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…