Richardson v. District Court (Cabada)

Richardson · Supreme Court of Nevada · September 13, 2021 · No. 81829; related appellate case number 21-26388

Summary

The Supreme Court of Nevada considered Peter Richardson’s petition for a writ of mandamus in an original civil proceeding involving the Eighth Judicial District Court and real parties in interest Jose Alberto Cabada-Orozco and Oscar Cabada. The en banc court submitted the matter without oral argument and denied the petition on September 13, 2021. A notice in lieu of remittitur was issued on October 8, 2021, and the case was closed.

Court
Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction
Nevada
Decision date
September 13, 2021
Docket number
81829; related appellate case number 21-26388
Procedural posture
Original civil proceeding in which petitioner sought a writ of mandamus from the Supreme Court of Nevada.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Peter Richardson v. Kenneth C. Cory, The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark
Disposition
writ_denied

Topics

appellate procedurecivil procedureremedies

Practice areas

civil procedureappellate proceduremandamus

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Supreme Court of Nevada should grant Richardson's petition for a writ of mandamus.

Key quotations

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Factual background

The provided text contains no substantive factual findings or description of the underlying dispute. It identifies Richardson as the petitioner and Jose Alberto Cabada-Orozco and Oscar Cabada as real parties in interest in the mandamus proceeding.

Procedural history

Richardson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus on September 23, 2020. The Supreme Court directed an answer, received briefing, submitted the matter for decision without oral argument on May 21, 2021, and denied the petition in an en banc order dated September 13, 2021. A notice in lieu of remittitur issued on October 8, 2021, and the case was closed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…