Nolan v. Wolfson

Nolan · Supreme Court of Nevada · January 28, 2022 · No. No. 83616

Summary

The Supreme Court of Nevada dismissed Ricky Nolan’s pro se appeal as untimely. The court determined that notice of entry of the district court’s order was mailed on August 19, 2021, making the September 23, 2021 filing deadline applicable, while Nolan’s earliest notice of appeal was not filed until October 4, 2021.

Court
Supreme Court of Nevada
Writing for the Court
Silver, J.; Pickering, J.
Jurisdiction
Nevada
Decision date
January 28, 2022
Docket number
No. 83616
Procedural posture
Pro se appeal from an order dismissing the complaint, denying appointment of counsel, and denying reconsideration.
Standard of review
Appellate jurisdiction and timeliness of a notice of appeal are questions governed by the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure; an untimely notice of appeal deprives the Supreme Court of jurisdiction.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Ricky Nolan v. Steven Wolfson, Mary K. Holthus, James R. Sweetin, Sarah Overly, Clark County District Attorneys Office, Elizabeth A. Brown, Frank R. Logrippo, Stefany Cler Miley, Katlyn Brady
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionappellate procedurefinal judgment rulecivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedureappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the notices of appeal were timely when notice of entry of the challenged order was mailed on August 19, 2021.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court had jurisdiction when the earliest notice of appeal was filed after the applicable appeal period expired.
  3. Whether the date appellant received the notice of entry, rather than the date it was mailed, controlled calculation of the appeal period.

Holdings

  1. Service by mail is complete upon mailing, and the appeal period begins when notice of entry of the order is served by mailing.
  2. The date an appellant actually receives notice of entry is irrelevant when determining the start of the appeal period; the period runs from service of the notice.
  3. An untimely notice of appeal deprives the Supreme Court of jurisdiction, requiring dismissal of the appeal.

Key quotations

Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal (3)

Factual background

The district court dismissed Nolan's complaint and denied his motions for appointment of counsel and reconsideration. Notice of entry of the August 11, 2021, order was stated to have been served by mail on August 19, 2021. Nolan filed four notices of appeal more than 33 days later and disputed whether notice had been timely mailed, but the district court's response, based on witness testimony, established that the notice was mailed on August 19.

Procedural history

The Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, entered the challenged order on August 11, 2021. After remanding for a factual determination concerning whether notice of entry had been mailed, the Supreme Court construed the district court's response as finding that notice was mailed on August 19, 2021. Because appellant's earliest notice of appeal was not filed until October 4, 2021, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…