Summary
The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from an order granting summary judgment because the appellants had filed a timely motion for reconsideration that qualified as a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4). The court held that the notice of appeal filed before resolution of that motion was premature and ineffective to confer jurisdiction.
Holdings
- A notice of appeal filed after a timely tolling motion is filed but before the district court enters a written order finally resolving that motion is of no effect and does not invoke the Nevada Supreme Court's jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Nevada Supreme Court had jurisdiction over a notice of appeal filed after entry of written judgment but while a timely motion for reconsideration qualifying as a tolling motion remained unresolved.
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed as premature under NRAP 4(a)(4) and NRAP 4(a)(6).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- AA Primo Builders v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…