Old Republic Insurance Company v. Stratford Insurance Company

168 N.H. 548 (2016) · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · January 26, 2016 · No. 2015-0123

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire answered certified questions from the First Circuit concerning when an excess insurer's duty to defend is triggered. The court held that an excess insurer has no duty to defend until the primary insurer's coverage limits are exhausted. It distinguished its prior decision in Universal Underwriters, explaining that the earlier case involved co-primary insurers with mutually repugnant excess clauses.

Holdings

  1. Under New Hampshire law, an excess insurer's duty to defend a claim is triggered only when the primary insurer's coverage has been exhausted.
  2. Universal Underwriters does not require a true excess insurer to share defense costs with a primary insurer before exhaustion of the primary policy because Universal Underwriters concerned two co-primary insurers.

Questions Presented

  1. Under New Hampshire law, when is an excess insurer's duty to defend triggered?
  2. Does an excess insurer's duty to defend arise only after the primary insurer's coverage is exhausted?
  3. If the excess insurer's duty to defend is not limited to exhaustion of the primary policy, what rule governs allocation and timing of defense costs?

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (20)

  • Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 134 N.H. 315 (1991)(distinguished; limited)
  • Progressive Northern Insurance Co. v. Argonaut Insurance Co., 161 N.H. 778, 784 (2011)(followed)
  • Calabraro v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 142 N.H. 308, 311 (1997)(followed)
  • Travelers Casualty v. American International Surplus Lines, 465 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1028 (S.D. Cal. 2006)(persuasive)
  • Texas Employers Insurance v. Underwriting Members, 836 F. Supp. 398, 404-05 (S.D. Tex. 1993)(persuasive)
  • Contrans, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 836 F.2d 163, 173 (3d Cir. 1987)(persuasive)
  • Sport Rock International, Inc. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA, 65 A.D.3d 12, 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)(persuasive)
  • Holmes Group, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 03-11671-NG, 2005 WL 4134556, at *8 (D. Mass. Oct. 5, 2005)(persuasive)
  • Signal Companies v. Harbor Insurance Co., 612 P.2d 889, 894 (Cal. 1980) (en banc)(persuasive)
  • Schneider National Transport v. Ford Motor Co., 280 F.3d 532, 538 (5th Cir. 2002)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…