State of New Mexico v. Nicholas Schmidt a/k/a Nicholas Andrew Schmidt

No. A-1-CA-41744 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2026) · New Mexico Court of Appeals · March 31, 2026 · No. A-1-CA-41744

Summary

The New Mexico Court of Appeals considers whether the spousal privilege protects communications between spouses concerning the abuse of a foster child. The court holds that a foster child in the care of one or both spouses is “a child of either” under Rule 11-505(D)(1)(a) NMRA, triggering the exception to the privilege. The court reverses and remands the district court’s exclusion of the communications.

Holdings

  1. A child entrusted by the state to the care of licensed foster parents is "a child of either" spouse for purposes of the Rule 11-505(D)(1)(a) exception to the spousal privilege.
  2. No additional factual showing of a significant indicia of parental status, a long-term relationship, or a particular degree of parental attachment is necessary when the spouses share a formal foster-parent relationship with the child.
  3. The Court of Appeals reviews the interpretation of Rule 11-505(D)(1)(a) and its application to the facts de novo.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the phrase "a child of either" in Rule 11-505(D)(1)(a) NMRA includes a foster child placed in the care of one or both spouses.
  2. Whether the State was required to prove that the foster-parent relationship had a significant indicia of parental status or would be long term before the spousal-privilege exception applied.
  3. What standard of review governs the interpretation and application of Rule 11-505(D)(1)(a) NMRA.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (20)

  • State v. Duran, 2015-NMCA-015, ¶ 11, 343 P.3d 207(cited)
  • State v. Lucero, 2023-NMCA-035, ¶ 18, 528 P.3d 762(applied)
  • Allen v. LeMaster, 2012-NMSC-001, ¶ 11, 267 P.3d 806(applied)
  • State v. Oppenheimer & Co., 2019-NMCA-045, ¶ 6, 447 P.3d 1159(applied)
  • State v. Lopez, 2023-NMSC-011, ¶ 10, 529 P.3d 893(applied)
  • Chaterjee v. King, 2012-NMSC-019, ¶ 12, 280 P.3d 283(applied)
  • State v. Evans, 2023-NMCA-004, ¶ 7, 521 P.3d 1257(applied)
  • State v. Tarver, 2005-NMCA-030, ¶ 9, 137 N.M. 115, 108 P.3d 1(applied)
  • In re Gabriel M., 2002-NMCA-047, ¶ 12, 132 N.M. 124, 45 P.3d 64(applied)
  • State v. Howell, 1979-NMCA-069, ¶¶ 4, 7, 93 N.M. 64, 596 P.2d 277(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…