Summary
The New York Appellate Division, First Department dismissed two appeals in a matrimonial proceeding. It held that the appeal from the pendente lite order was unavailable because the order was entered upon the wife's default, and that the wife was not an aggrieved party with respect to the nesting-schedule order to which she had consented.
Holdings
- An appeal does not lie from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party; the defaulting party's remedy is a motion to vacate the default rather than an appeal.
- A party who consented to an order and received the relief requested in that order is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLR 5511 and may not appeal it.
Questions Presented
- Whether an appeal lies from a pendente lite order entered upon the appealing wife's default.
- Whether the wife was an aggrieved party entitled to appeal an order setting a nesting schedule to which she consented.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Matter of Jabuki M. v. Nicole B., 196 AD3d 405, 405 (1st Dept 2021)(followed)
- U.S. Bank N.A. v. Tiburcio, 199 AD3d 620, 620 (1st Dept 2021)(followed)
- Deutsch v. Deutch, 194 AD3d 542, 542 (1st Dept 2021)(followed)
- Matter of Miguel L. v. Ashley J.L., 177 AD3d 476, 477 (1st Dept 2019)(followed)
- Matter of Jessica M. v. Julio G.R., 176 AD3d 584, 584-585 (1st Dept 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…