Bokum v. BUFNY II Assoc., L.P.

Bokum v. BUFNY II Assoc., L.P. 2025 NY Slip Op 03013 · Appellate Division, First Department · May 20, 2025 · No. Index No. 301007/14; Appeal No. 4391; Case No. 2024-03573

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed an order granting defendants' motions to vacate a default judgment under CPLR 317, concluding that the defendants lacked actual notice and established prima facie meritorious defenses. The court determined that service of process on the Secretary of State pursuant to Partnership Law satisfied due process requirements for personal jurisdiction. Furthermore, the court upheld the denial of a motion to dismiss, finding the defendants presented adequate showings of meritorious defenses against the plaintiffs' Labor Law and negligence claims.

Court
Appellate Division, First Department
Writing for the Court
Webber, J.P.; Friedman, Gesmer; Rosado, Michael, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
May 20, 2025
Docket number
Index No. 301007/14; Appeal No. 4391; Case No. 2024-03573
Procedural posture
Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County order vacating a default judgment and denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Salimata Bokum et al. v. BUFNY II Associates, L.P., Black United Fund Of New York, Inc., South Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation d/b/a SoBro
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

personal jurisdictionservice of processdefault judgmentmotions to dismissappellate procedure

Practice areas

civil procedureappellate proceduretorts

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the defendants were entitled to vacate the default judgment under CPLR 317 based on lack of actual notice and meritorious defenses
  2. Whether the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction should be denied.

Holdings

  1. The Appellate Division affirmed that the defendants were entitled to vacate the default judgment because they established a prima facie showing of lack of actual notice and meritorious defenses, satisfying the discretion of CPLR 317.
  2. The motion to dismiss was properly denied because service of process on the Secretary of State satisfied personal jurisdiction regardless of actual receipt.

Key quotations

[I]t cannot be inferred solely from the failure to update [a] defendant's address with the Secretary of State that [the] defendant was deliberately avoiding receiving notice (211 AD3d at 577)
Jurisdiction was obtained by service of process on the Secretary of State, "irrespective of whether the process ever actually reached" BUFNY (63 AD3d at 554)

Factual background

The plaintiffs obtained default judgments against BUFNY II Associates and SoBro after alleged failure to serve proper notice. The defendants asserted they never received actual notice, presented affidavits and contracts showing lack of ownership or control over the premises where the decedent fell, and raised meritorious defenses to labor law and negligence claims.

Procedural history

The Supreme Court, Bronx County granted motions of BUFNY II Associates and SoBro to vacate a January 5, 2023 default judgment and a January 7, 2015 default order, and denied BUFNY's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The appellants appealed, and the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's rulings.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…