Distel v. Distel

2025 NY Slip Op 5147 (Appellate Division First Department 2025) · Appellate Division, First Department · September 25, 2025 · No. Index No. 365055/23; Appeal No. 4769; Case No. 2025-00482

Summary

This Appellate Division, First Department opinion reviews a lower court's order imposing sanctions on a nonparty attorney for frivolous conduct in a matrimonial action. The appellate court modified the order by reducing the attorney's fees awarded to opposing counsel and directing the balance of the sanction to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection under 22 NYCRR 130-1.3. The decision affirms the sanctions while clarifying statutory payment requirements and prohibiting impermissible "fees on fees."

Court
Appellate Division, First Department
Writing for the Court
Scarpulla, J.P.; Friedman, J.; González, J.; Shulman, J.; Rosado, J.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
September 25, 2025
Docket number
Index No. 365055/23; Appeal No. 4769; Case No. 2025-00482
Procedural posture
Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County order (Jan. 21, 2025) granting in part defendant husband's motion for attorney's fees and sanctions against nonparty attorney Diana Arnone; appeal limited to the sanction provisions.
Standard of review
abuse of discretion
Precedential value
published
Parties
Diana Arnone v. Erika Distel, Edward Distel
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sanctionsattorney feesfamily lawappellate procedurecivil procedure

Practice areas

family lawcivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the sanction payment must be made to the Lawyers' Fund rather than opposing counsel under 22 NYCRR 130-1.3
  2. Whether attorney's fees awarded to defendant's counsel constitute impermissible fees on fees
  3. Whether the appellate court should modify the sanction amount and payment instructions

Holdings

  1. The sanction payment must be made to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection; directing payment to opposing counsel is improper.
  2. Attorney's fees incurred in pursuing the motion for sanctions are impermissible "fees on fees" and defendant's counsel is not entitled to them.
  3. The sanction amount is modified to $5,545 and directed to be paid into the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection.

Key quotations

The court was therefore well within its broad discretion in sanctioning Arnone for frivolous conduct (see Rules of Chief Admr of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1.1[a]; [c]).

Factual background

After a May 2024 conference in a matrimonial action, nonparty attorney Diana Arnone made ex parte communications with the Integrated Domestic Violence court seeking transfer, submitted an order to show cause without required motion avoidance conference, and failed to explain an alleged emergency. The trial court imposed sanctions and attorney's fees against her.

Procedural history

The Supreme Court ordered sanctions against nonparty attorney Diana Arnone, directing payment to opposing counsel and to the Lawyers' Fund. The appellate division reviewed the order, focusing on the propriety of the payment directives and the award of attorney's fees.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…