Matter of Mohammad M. v. Sara R.

2025 NY Slip Op 02858 · Appellate Division, First Department · May 8, 2025 · No. Docket No. V-00202-22, V-02029-22; Appeal No. 4312; Case No. 2024-06064

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a Family Court order granting the father primary legal and physical custody of the parties' child. The court determined that the Family Court's decision had a sound and substantial basis in the record, citing improved educational and emotional outcomes for the child under the father's care. The appellate court also rejected the mother's argument regarding deprivation of counsel, noting that the trial court properly appointed multiple attorneys and a legal advisor before permitting her to proceed pro se.

Court
Appellate Division, First Department
Writing for the Court
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P.; Kennedy; Scarpulla; Mendez; Rodriguez
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
May 8, 2025
Docket number
Docket No. V-00202-22, V-02029-22; Appeal No. 4312; Case No. 2024-06064
Procedural posture
Appeal from Family Court order granting primary legal and physical custody to father.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Sara R. v. Mohammad M.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

child custodyfamily law

Practice areas

family law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Family Court erred in granting primary legal and physical custody to the father.
  2. Whether the mother was denied her constitutional right to counsel.

Holdings

  1. The Family Court did not err; its order granting primary legal and physical custody to the father is affirmed.
  2. The mother was not denied her right to counsel; the assignment of two attorneys and a legal advisor satisfied the statutory requirement.

Key quotations

Family Court's order has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Gregory L.B. v Magdelena G., 68 AD3d 478, 479 [1st Dept 2009]).
The testimony adduced at trial and the documentary evidence showed that the child's school attendance and grades had dramatically improved since moving with the father to Tennessee.

Factual background

The father petitioned for primary legal and physical custody of the child. After moving with the father to Tennessee, the child's school attendance and grades improved dramatically and the child's encopresis resolved. While in the mother's care, the child was frequently absent or late to school and lacked stability. The mother was assigned two attorneys and later a legal advisor after her counsel withdrew.

Procedural history

Family Court entered an order on August 15, 2024 granting the father primary legal and physical custody of the child. The order was appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department, which affirmed the Family Court's decision.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…