People v. Rivera

2025 NY Slip Op 03654 · Appellate Division, First Department · June 17, 2025 · No. Ind. No. 71374/23; Appeal No. 4599; Case No. 2024-01069

Summary

This Appellate Division, First Department decision reviews a defendant’s direct appeal following a guilty plea to third-degree assault. The court addresses the defendant’s appeal waiver, finding it valid and barring review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the court partially modifies the probation condition by striking the provision authorizing warrantless searches for illegal drugs and paraphernalia as unrelated to rehabilitation, while upholding the condition permitting warrantless searches for weapons.

Court
Appellate Division, First Department
Writing for the Court
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P.; Webber, J.; Kapnick, J.; Higgitt, J.; Michael, J.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
June 17, 2025
Docket number
Ind. No. 71374/23; Appeal No. 4599; Case No. 2024-01069
Procedural posture
Appeal from conviction and sentencing in the Supreme Court, Bronx County; appellant waived right to appeal and challenged a probation condition requiring consent to warrantless searches.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Adam Rivera v. People of the State of New York
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

probationsearch and seizurewarrant requirementcriminal procedureappellate jurisdiction

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the defendant's waiver of his appellate rights was valid.
  2. Whether a probation condition authorizing warrantless searches for weapons is reasonably related to rehabilitation.
  3. Whether a probation condition authorizing warrantless searches for illegal drugs and paraphernalia is reasonably related to rehabilitation.

Holdings

  1. The waiver was valid because the oral colloquy and the written waiver signed after counsel consultation adequately apprised the defendant of the rights he was relinquishing.
  2. The condition permitting warrantless searches for weapons is permissible because it is reasonably necessary to ensure the defendant leads a law‑abiding life.
  3. The condition authorizing warrantless searches for illegal drugs and paraphernalia is not reasonably related to rehabilitation and must be struck.

Key quotations

"reasonably necessary to insure that the defendant will lead a law-abiding life or to assist him to do so"
"was not reasonably related to defendant's rehabilitation"

Factual background

Rivera pleaded guilty to assault in the third degree and was sentenced to two years probation. The probation order required him to consent to searches of his person, vehicle, and home for illegal drugs, paraphernalia, weapons, and other items. He was armed with a sharp object during the assault, had no drug involvement, and had no history of substance‑abuse offenses.

Procedural history

The Supreme Court, Bronx County convicted Rivera of assault in the third degree and sentenced him to two years probation with a condition authorizing warrantless searches for drugs and paraphernalia. Rivera waived his right to appeal and appealed the probation condition. The Appellate Division considered the validity of the waiver and the reasonableness of the search condition.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…