People v. Vasquetelles

2025 NY Slip Op 05198 (Appellate Division First Department 2025) · Appellate Division, First Department · September 30, 2025 · No. Ind. No. 72490/23; Appeal No. 4788; Case No. 2024-05365

Summary

This Appellate Division, First Department decision reviews a Bronx County Supreme Court judgment convicting the defendant of third-degree assault and imposing three years of probation. The court upheld the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal an excessive sentence claim but modified the judgment by striking two probation conditions related to gang affiliation due to lack of evidentiary support. Additionally, the court vacated mandatory sentencing surcharges and fees under its interest of justice authority, while rejecting the defendant's constitutional challenges to the remaining probation terms.

Court
Appellate Division, First Department
Writing for the Court
Kern, J.P.; Scarpulla; Kapnick; Gesmer; Hagler
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
September 30, 2025
Docket number
Ind. No. 72490/23; Appeal No. 4788; Case No. 2024-05365
Procedural posture
Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County
Precedential value
published
Parties
Ignacio Vasquetelles v. People of the State of New York
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

probationappellate procedurefirst amendmentfifth amendmentfourteenth amendment

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appellant's waiver of appeal forecloses challenges to the probation conditions and constitutional claims
  2. Whether the probation condition prohibiting gang paraphernalia is reasonably related to rehabilitation and therefore valid
  3. Whether the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing should be vacated

Holdings

  1. The waiver does not foreclose challenges to the legality of the probation conditions, but the constitutional claims are unpreserved and therefore not reviewed.
  2. The condition prohibiting the defendant from wearing or displaying gang paraphernalia must be stricken because it is not reasonably related to rehabilitation.
  3. The mandatory surcharge and fees are vacated under the court's interest‑of‑justice powers.

Key quotations

Defendant validly waived his right to appeal ... the waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see id. at 559-560). (559-560)
Thus, the condition "was not reasonably related to defendant's rehabilitation, or necessary to ensure that he will lead a law-abiding life" (Alvarez, 233 AD3d at 620; see Penal Law § 65.10 [1]). (620)

Factual background

Ignacio Vasquetelles was convicted of assault in the third degree and placed on three years probation with conditions including a prohibition on wearing or displaying gang paraphernalia and an association with gangs. He waived his right to appeal and challenged the probation conditions and mandatory surcharge and fees.

Procedural history

The Supreme Court, Bronx County convicted the defendant of assault in the third degree and sentenced him to three years probation with several conditions. The defendant waived his right to appeal. The People appealed the judgment.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…