Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed an order granting the plaintiff summary judgment on liability and dismissing the defendants' affirmative defenses. The court held that the decedent was negligent for leaving an unattended vehicle in neutral without engaging the parking brake, and that the defendants failed to raise a triable issue regarding plaintiff's culpable conduct, assumption of risk, or the emergency doctrine.
Holdings
- Plaintiff established prima facie that the decedent was negligent because he left the vehicle unattended, in neutral, and without engaging the parking brake, thereby failing to secure it against movement. Defendants failed to raise an issue of fact.
- Defendants failed to raise an issue of fact supporting assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, or culpable conduct because they submitted no evidence that plaintiff engaged in conduct contributing to the accident or assumed the risk of being struck by a vehicle while walking on the sidewalk.
- Defendants failed to raise an issue of fact under the emergency doctrine because they submitted no evidence that the events giving rise to the accident were not of the decedent's own making.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on liability based on the decedent's failure to secure the unattended vehicle.
- Whether defendants raised an issue of fact regarding negligence or proximate causation.
- Whether defendants raised issues of fact supporting the affirmative defenses of assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, culpable conduct, or the emergency doctrine.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Franco v. City of New York, 168 A.D.3d 543 (1st Dep't 2019)(followed)
- Stewart v. Ellison, 28 A.D.3d 252, 254 (1st Dep't 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…