Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, affirmed an order modifying the parties’ joint custody arrangement and awarding the mother sole custody. The court held that the parents’ acrimonious relationship supported ending joint custody and that the father failed to establish a sufficient change in circumstances warranting a change in the children’s primary residence.
Holdings
- Modification of the existing joint custody arrangement and an award of sole custody to the mother were proper because the parties had an acrimonious relationship and were unable to communicate with each other in a civil manner.
- The father failed to establish a change in circumstances reflecting a real need to change the children's primary physical residence to ensure that their best interests were served.
- The established custodial arrangement should not be changed solely to accommodate a child's desire to live with one parent.
Questions Presented
- Whether Family Court properly modified the existing joint custody arrangement and awarded sole custody to the mother based on the parties' acrimonious relationship and inability to communicate civilly.
- Whether the father established a change in circumstances reflecting a real need to change the children's primary physical residence in order to serve their best interests.
- Whether a child's expressed desire to live with a parent, standing alone, justified changing the established custodial arrangement.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Matter of Christopher J.S. v. Colleen A.B., 43 A.D.3d 1350, 1350-1351 (2007)(followed)
- Matter of James D. v. Tammy W., 45 A.D.3d 1358 (2007)(followed)
- Fox v. Fox, 177 A.D.2d 209, 211 (1992)(followed)
- Matter of Johnston v. Bridenbecker, 300 A.D.2d 1062 (2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…