Summary
The court reversed an order denying summary judgment to the owners of a building in a premises-liability action arising from a trip on a sidewalk. It held that the sidewalk defect was too trivial to be actionable as a matter of law and dismissed the complaint against the defendants.
Holdings
- The sidewalk defect was too trivial to be actionable as a matter of law.
- Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, so summary judgment dismissing the complaint was proper.
Questions Presented
- Whether the sidewalk defect was too trivial to be actionable as a matter of law.
- Whether plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact sufficient to defeat defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (7)
- Stylianou v Ansonia Condominium, 49 A.D.3d 399 (2008)(followed)
- Zalkin v City of New York, 36 A.D.3d 801 (2007)(followed)
- Trionfero v Vanderhorn, 6 A.D.3d 903, 904 (2004)(followed)
- Mishaan v Tobias, 32 A.D.3d 1000, 1001-1002 (2006)(distinguished)
- Billera v Paolangeli, 20 A.D.3d 743, 745 (2005)(distinguished)
- McKenzie v Crossroads Arena, 291 A.D.2d 860 (2002), leave to appeal dismissed, 98 N.Y.2d 647 (2002)(distinguished)
- Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562 (1980)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…