Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order awarding the father sole legal and physical custody of the parties' child. The court held that the Family Court's best-interests determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record and declined to disturb it.
Holdings
- The Family Court properly awarded the father sole legal and physical custody because the determination that the award was in the child's best interests had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
- The mother's remaining contention was unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, lacked merit.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Family Court's award of sole legal and physical custody to the father was supported by the child's best interests and had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
- Whether the mother's remaining appellate contention was preserved for review.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171-173(followed)
- Matter of Langlaise v. Sookhan, 48 A.D.3d 685, 685(followed)
- Matter of McKoy v. Vatter, 106 A.D.3d 1090(followed)
- Matter of Perez v. Martinez, 52 A.D.3d 518, 519(followed)
- Matter of Guzman v. Pizarro, 102 A.D.3d 964, 965(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…