Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed an order denying the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability in a personal-injury action. The court held that the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing because the evidence presented triable issues concerning responsibility for detaching a loading platform and whether the plaintiff operated the pallet-moving scooter negligently. The court therefore affirmed the denial of summary judgment regardless of the sufficiency of the defendants' opposing papers.
Holdings
- The plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment because he failed to make a prima facie showing that no material issue of fact existed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff established entitlement to summary judgment on liability by demonstrating the absence of any material issue of fact.
- Whether the deposition evidence created triable issues concerning responsibility for detaching the metal platform and the plaintiff's allegedly negligent operation of the scooter.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324(followed)
- Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853(followed)
- Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562(followed)
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395, 404(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…