Summary
The Appellate Division, Third Department dismissed as moot a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination because the determination had been administratively reversed, expunged, and the mandatory surcharge refunded. The court granted the petitioner reimbursement of $21.40 in filing-related expenses and disbursements.
Holdings
- The petition must be dismissed as moot because Harris received all relief to which he was entitled: administrative reversal of the determination, expungement of references from his institutional record, and refund of the mandatory surcharge.
- Harris was entitled to disbursements of $21.40, consisting of the reduced filing fee and other expenses associated with the proceeding.
Questions Presented
- Whether the article 78 proceeding became moot after the challenged disciplinary determination was administratively reversed, expunged from Harris's institutional record, and the mandatory surcharge was refunded.
- Whether Harris was entitled to reimbursement of his $15 reduced filing fee and $6.40 in other proceeding-related expenses.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Matter of Upson v. Rich, 190 A.D.3d 1182, 1182 (3d Dep't 2021)(followed)
- Matter of Dibble v. Venettozzi, 181 A.D.3d 1139, 1139 (3d Dep't 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…