Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order designating Brian Banister a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court upheld the assessment of risk-assessment points and concluded that Banister failed to establish grounds for a downward departure from the presumptive risk level.
Holdings
- The County Court properly assessed 15 points for a prior felony conviction, 15 points for a history of drug or alcohol abuse, and 20 points for unsatisfactory conduct while confined involving sexual misconduct.
- The defendant was not entitled to a downward departure because he failed to identify and establish the required mitigating factor and supporting facts.
Questions Presented
- Whether the County Court properly assessed points under SORA risk factors 9, 11, and 13.
- Whether the defendant established a legally appropriate mitigating factor and supporting facts warranting a downward departure from the presumptive level three risk designation.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- People v. Polanco-Lopez, 239 A.D.3d 778, 779(followed)
- People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 572-573(followed)
- People v. Mizrahi, 237 A.D.3d 980, 981(followed)
- People v. Camacho-Gutierrez, 210 A.D.3d 811, 812(followed)
- People v. Mohansingh, 199 A.D.3d 945(followed)
- People v. Vasquez, 197 A.D.3d 1185, 1186(followed)
- People v. Perez, 199 A.D.3d 946(followed)
- People v. Selby, 191 A.D.3d 813(followed)
- People v. Curry, 158 A.D.3d 52, 58(followed)
- People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…